Loading your local date and time… Detecting device time zone and language…
Call (630) 246-2762 Text updates coming soon Donate
Location is not requested automatically. Use the button to share your device location for local campaign information.
ROBERT R. MOTTA • PRESIDENT 2028 • ONE TERM. GET IT DONE.
Family justice · due process · police accountability

Title IV-D Reform With Facts, Records and Constitutional Safeguards

Listen to parents, creators, lawyers, police officers, court employees and children—but do not turn a YouTube claim into a legal conclusion. The Motta standard is primary records, open hearings, measurable reform and due process for every family.

Plain-language conclusion: Title IV-D is a real federal-state child-support program with federal matching funds, state performance incentives and formal cooperation with courts and law enforcement. Those facts justify serious conflict-of-interest and due-process oversight. They do not prove that every support order is fraudulent, that every judge or agency employee belongs to a criminal enterprise, or that a parent can erase an order by declaring that no contract exists.
What federal law actually says

Separate documented structure from disputed legal theories

Courts, agencies and contractors can be investigated and held accountable. Accusations still require evidence tied to an identified case, order, payment record, communication or official finding.

Documented Congress created Title IV-D under the Social Security Act to establish parentage, obtain and enforce child and spousal support, locate noncustodial parents and make services available beyond public-assistance cases.
Documented Federal law provides performance-based incentive payments to states. Measures include parentage establishment, support orders, current payments, arrears payments and cost effectiveness.
Documented Federal regulations authorize cooperative arrangements with courts and law-enforcement officials and permit reimbursement for qualifying assistance.
Documented safeguard Before a Title IV-D agency seeks civil contempt, federal regulations require screening for ability to pay, providing relevant information to the court and giving clear notice that ability to pay is the critical question.
Not established as a blanket rule The claim that every IV-D matter is merely a private commercial contract requiring voluntary consent, that no enforceable court order exists, or that the entire national program is criminal racketeering.
Campaign position Financial incentives and institutional cooperation create risks that deserve auditing, disclosure and procedural safeguards. A risk of conflict is not proof that every individual case is corrupt.
Creator review

Amen Osiris and “IV-D Crime Family” Content

Amen Osiris publishes extensive videos challenging child-support agencies, jurisdiction, applications, contractor relationships and civil-rights remedies.

Credit the creator

What his content contributes

His channel pushes parents to read statutes, regulations, orders and agency documents rather than entering court completely unprepared. He focuses public attention on incentives, contractor arrangements, consent arguments, procedural defects and self-represented litigants.

Fact-check boundary

Where viewers must slow down

Statutes should be read in context with state family law, procedural rules, appellate decisions and the actual signed order. A regulation describing applications or cooperative arrangements does not automatically prove lack of jurisdiction, an invalid support order, fraud or a successful federal civil-rights claim.

Proposed public role

Fathers’ advocate and Title IV-D reform adviser

Invite Amen Osiris to present his strongest documented examples and help design audits of IV-D entry, applications, assignments, incentives, contractor payments, ledgers, contempt, ability-to-pay findings, detention, and modification delays. The commission must also include parents receiving support, mothers, adult children, noncustodial parents, family-law attorneys, auditors, judges, agency officials, and constitutional scholars.

This is a proposed advisory and hearing invitation—not legal counsel, endorsement, acceptance, or agreement with every “IV-D crime family” claim. Valid child-support orders remain enforceable unless lawfully modified, stayed, or reversed.

Police encounters and public records

Thabo & Ray: Video Evidence Is a Starting Point, Not the Final Verdict

The channel follows Raymond Feaste and Thabo and publishes claims involving traffic stops, police targeting, court proceedings and fear of retaliation.

What is publicly verifiable

A federal civil-rights lawsuit captioned Feaste v. Dooly County, Georgia, et al. was filed in the Middle District of Georgia on May 22, 2026. Filing a complaint establishes that allegations were made; it does not establish that the defendants violated the law. The claims must be tested through motions, evidence and adjudication.

Campaign accountability standard

  • Preserve complete body-camera, dash-camera, dispatch and citation records.
  • Publish the entire sequence, not only selected clips.
  • Track officer statements against video, reports and sworn testimony.
  • Protect complainants, witnesses and honest officers from retaliation.
  • Label pending allegations, dismissed claims, settlements and adjudicated findings accurately.

Proposed public role: invite Ray to testify as a citizen witness about recording police encounters, obtaining records and navigating civil-rights litigation.

Will County, Illinois accountability

Judge Joseph C. Polito: Documented Discipline and Unresolved Case Questions

The official disciplinary record must be separated from Robert Motta’s personal allegations about his own divorce, child-support, arrears, contempt, detention, notice, counsel, and due-process history.

What the official Illinois record establishes

The Illinois Courts Commission found that Associate Judge Joseph C. Polito frequently used his Will County-issued work computer to access pornographic websites during work hours in his chambers between 2010 and August 2011. The Commission suspended him without pay for 60 days.

That disciplinary finding is documented. It does not automatically establish that every ruling Polito entered was unlawful or that Robert Motta’s separate case claims have already been proven.

Robert Motta’s Will County reform position

Robert Motta says his own proceedings before Judge Polito raise unresolved questions involving default procedure, notice, representation, ability to pay, support accounting, contempt, detention, and access to a meaningful review. These are Robert Motta’s personal allegations and campaign position; they require transcripts, signed orders, payment records, agency files, attorney records, and applicable appellate law.

  • Notify affected litigants when a judge is formally disciplined for misconduct occurring during the period of their cases.
  • Provide affordable access to transcripts, docket histories, signed orders, payment ledgers, and IV-D case-entry records.
  • Create an independent process to review credible claims that misconduct, conflicts, disability, unavailable records, or denial of counsel affected a proceeding.
  • Do not invalidate an order through campaign rhetoric; use lawful motions, appeals, post-judgment review, judicial discipline, civil-rights procedures, or legislation.
  • Publish county-level data on contempt, detention, purge amounts, modifications, arrears corrections, reversals, and complaints.
Campaign standard: Call documented misconduct what it is. Label personal allegations as allegations. Preserve evidence. Give every accused official due process. Give every affected parent a realistic path to obtain the record and seek lawful review.
Legal education and accountability

Robert Gouveia, Esq. — “Watching the Watchers”

Robert Gouveia is an Arizona criminal-defense attorney and the host of a legal-commentary channel focused on accountability, transparency, criminal procedure, courts and police conduct.

Useful contribution

Gouveia’s content can help voters understand warrants, hearings, evidence, criminal procedure, judicial rulings and the difference between an allegation, charge, conviction, dismissal and appeal.

Proposed public role

Invite him as a legal-education and police-accountability hearing witness—not as a judge and not as counsel for individual visitors—to explain due process, body-camera evidence, police reports, prosecutorial decisions and responsible public case analysis.

Featuring his channel does not imply his endorsement, acceptance or agreement with the campaign.

Motta 2028 proposal

Title IV-D Family Justice and Due Process Reform Act

Support children while ending inaccurate accounting, coercive shortcuts, unnecessary incarceration and hidden institutional incentives.

Family-court safeguards

  1. Plain-language case notice: identify whether the case is IV-D, how it entered the program, which agency is involved, and which services are being provided.
  2. Verified accounting: provide a complete payment ledger, interest calculation, assignment history, credits and arrears audit before enforcement escalation.
  3. Ability-to-pay findings: no incarceration or coercive purge amount without notice, financial evidence, an express finding and meaningful consideration of alternatives.
  4. Counsel and legal help: provide counsel when constitutionally required and expand independent assistance when liberty, custody or severe sanctions are at risk.
  5. License and employment protection: require individualized review before suspending licenses needed to work and pay support.
  6. Fast modification: prevent unpayable arrears from growing after verified disability, unemployment, incarceration or major income change.

Institutional accountability

  1. Incentive audit: publish federal and state funding, incentive formulas, contractor payments and county reimbursements.
  2. Judicial transparency: publish recusal rules, financial disclosures, complaint outcomes and reversal data without promising outcomes in individual cases.
  3. Independent ombudsman: investigate missing credits, mistaken identity, unlawful detention claims, retaliation and inaccessible records.
  4. Body-camera preservation: establish retention and disclosure rules for enforcement-related arrests and courthouse incidents.
  5. Public dashboards: report modifications, contempt referrals, jail use, processing times, errors corrected, collections reaching families and administrative costs.
  6. Balanced hearings: hear custodial parents, noncustodial parents, adult children, agency workers, judges, advocates and critics.
Legal-use notice: This page is campaign policy and public education, not legal advice. A person facing a hearing, contempt, arrest, appeal deadline or support dispute should obtain advice from a lawyer licensed in the relevant state. Do not ignore an order or deadline because of a YouTube theory.

Live Beta Website Help

The campaign website is operating as a live beta while the expanded public launch is prepared for approximately August 10, 2026. Accessibility controls, language help, diagnostics, form recovery and campaign support remain available during testing.

Help Center & Guided Chat Accessibility Policy Run Site Check Email Campaign Support
Support email: info@votemotta2028.com. The email-help button sends only when the visitor chooses Send. Successful online forms may also trigger a minimal campaign notification.