President Trump deserves credit for signing the law that created the United States Space Force. That does not place his private business interests, pardon decisions, media company, or Justice Department record beyond public scrutiny.
Robert R. Motta’s position is simple: protect America in space, invest in real science, separate public power from private profit, defend lawful speech, follow the money, protect victims, and never ask citizens to trust secrecy without oversight.
Robert R. Motta • Candidate for President 2028 • POTUS 48 • Commander in Chief • One Term. Get It Done.
/public_html/videos/ask-me-why-space-force-epstein-10sec.mp4. The player will appear automatically.Space systems protect GPS, communications, missile warning, weather, banking, transportation and military operations. Intelligence agencies can protect the country—or abuse secrecy. Private companies can accelerate science—or create conflicts when they overlap with presidential power.
A President must be able to praise a good decision, investigate a bad system, and disclose personal or financial conflicts without fear or favoritism.
The United States Space Force was established on December 20, 2019, when President Donald Trump signed the fiscal 2020 National Defense Authorization Act. The legislation had bipartisan support and reorganized existing military space functions into a new armed-service branch.
TAE Technologies—formerly called Tri Alpha Energy—and Trump Media announced a proposed all-stock merger in December 2025. The transaction was valued at more than $6 billion and remained subject to shareholder, regulatory and closing conditions.
The companies say the combination could finance TAE’s fusion program and support a future utility-scale plant. Their filings say shareholders of each side would own approximately half of the combined company on a fully diluted basis.
Read the SEC filingTAE has pursued hydrogen-boron fusion and collaborated with major scientific and technology partners. Fusion could become an important energy source, but commercial-scale claims still require engineering, licensing, cost and performance proof.
TAE company historyBecause federal agencies regulate and fund energy research, critics have called for oversight of possible conflicts. A conflict concern is not proof of corruption; it is a reason for disclosure, recusal rules, independent grant scoring and public contract records.
Read a congressional critic’s statementStart with the SEC filing and TAE’s own announcement for transaction terms, ownership structure, stated goals and closing conditions.
Reuters and the Associated Press have reported on the proposed merger, the fusion opportunity and concerns created by a president’s connection to a company that could interact with federal regulators and funding programs.
The American Nuclear Society has covered the fusion transaction as an industry development, while congressional critics have requested conflict-of-interest safeguards. Voters can support fusion research and still demand strict ethics rules.
A President and immediate family should disclose beneficial ownership, place covered assets in a genuinely independent arrangement, publish recusals, identify federal decisions affecting major holdings, and prohibit political appointees from steering grants, contracts, permits or regulatory favors toward presidential businesses.
Science should win because the data works—not because a president owns shares.
Robert R. Motta reports that Truth Social restricted or removed his content after he posted that he did not believe Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. That is Robert Motta’s personal account; this page does not claim that a court or regulator has independently adjudicated the platform action.
The campaign will publish screenshots, notices, appeal records and dates when available. A platform dispute should be documented rather than exaggerated.
Motta position: private platforms may moderate content, but government coercion, secret blacklists, viewpoint discrimination and deceptive “free speech” branding deserve investigation and public debate.
The title is provocative, but the facts must remain separate from speculation.
Donald Barr wrote a 1973 science-fiction book called Space Relations. He had also been headmaster of the Dalton School. Jeffrey Epstein later taught there even though he lacked a college degree. That is unusual, but unusual facts alone do not prove a secret plot.
Bibliographic records confirm the 1973 novel. Reporting differs on whether Donald Barr personally hired Epstein: Barr announced his departure before Epstein began teaching, and reliable accounts describe the direct hiring role as unclear. Donald Barr’s son, William Barr, was Attorney General when Epstein died in federal custody in 2019.
People can notice connections. But a connection is not the same as evidence that people worked together.
The campaign will distinguish a documented relationship, a timing overlap, a disputed account, an allegation and a proven conspiracy. It will not use the book’s disturbing fictional themes as proof that Donald Barr, William Barr or the CIA directed Epstein’s crimes.
Whitney Webb and Mike Benz argue that Epstein should be studied within a longer history of organized crime, financial leverage, intelligence relationships and elite protection. Their work raises investigative questions; it does not substitute for admissible evidence or official findings.
Author of One Nation Under Blackmail, Webb connects Epstein to historical networks involving organized crime, intelligence and political influence. Her claims should be checked against records, testimony, court files and financial evidence.
Benz discusses possible intelligence dimensions, media narratives and missing records. Motta 2028 would invite him to present sources and questions to an independent public-record review—not declare his conclusions proven in advance.
The question is not only whether Epstein worked for an intelligence service. The larger duty is to identify any ongoing trafficking, blackmail, financial-crime or elite-protection networks; preserve records; protect survivors; examine shell companies and foreign contacts; and prosecute provable crimes without political exemptions.
No president can promise that no crime will ever happen. A President can build systems that make cover-ups, custodial negligence, selective prosecution and hidden conflicts harder.
Every high-risk or high-profile federal death in custody triggers an outside investigative team, evidence preservation and a public timeline.
Publish camera uptime, staffing vacancies, overtime, check logs and disciplinary outcomes while protecting legitimate security details.
Combine trafficking, money laundering, tax, cyber, foreign-intelligence and victim-services expertise.
Require senior DOJ, intelligence and White House officials to disclose relevant family, client, donor and business connections.
Extraordinary non-prosecution or immunity agreements receive judicial review, victim notice and public explanation to the maximum extent lawful.
Protect officers, analysts, contractors and prosecutors who report evidence destruction, retaliation or unlawful interference.
These are public-policy questions, not instructions about what to believe.
Should a President retain a large financial interest in a company that may seek federal energy approvals, grants, contracts or regulatory decisions?
Should a platform advertising itself as a free-speech alternative provide notice and a meaningful appeal before restricting a candidate’s lawful political post?
Do you accept the official suicide ruling, doubt it, or remain undecided—and which records would change your view?
Should presidents disclose who advocated for a pardon, including major donors, foreign officials, lobbyists and family members?
Should claims of CIA, foreign-intelligence or blackmail connections be reviewed by an independent panel with subpoena power?
Should every death in government custody receive an independent public report, regardless of the detainee’s politics, wealth or notoriety?
Live embeds may be limited by platform settings. Campaign posts are opinion unless linked to source records.
The campaign website is operating as a live beta while the expanded public launch is prepared for approximately August 10, 2026. Accessibility controls, language help, diagnostics, form recovery and campaign support remain available during testing.
Support email: info@votemotta2028.com. The email-help button sends only when the visitor chooses Send. Successful online forms may also trigger a minimal campaign notification.