Ideas that solve real problems
From energy to transport to safety and technology, builders help keep America moving forward.
Transcript
Well, something really troubling is happening on Wall Street right now and almost no one is talking about it. And so to keep it as simple as possible
8 seconds
because I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed. Try to try to explain this as if I'm a fifth grader, I suppose, because basically some really big money people17 seconds
on Wall Street are building a new button that allows them to make a lot of money if another big part of the economy24 seconds
suddenly collapses. It reminds me a lot of 2008 where a few people saw the housing collapse coming. People that32 seconds
were getting mortgages without jobs and they made billions of dollars when the housing collapse happened while the39 seconds
rest of the world suffered, myself included.44 seconds
Well, right now that very same thing is happening and we better pay attention to what's happening. But it's happening in a much different way. That's why we52 seconds
wanted to bring on David Morgan, author of the Morgan Report, an economist. He's also the author of Second Chance: How to59 seconds
Make and Keep Big Money from the Coming Gold and Silver Shockwave, a must-read book. David, great to see you and welcome to the show.1 minute, 8 seconds
Well, thanks for having me. It's a pleasure to be on.1 minute, 10 seconds
So, you know, I understand that this is in your wheelhouse, but it's pretty darn complicated. And as I was looking through these notes over the weekend1 minute, 18 seconds
when I was seeing these these little bits and pieces of this story, I was trying to piece this all together and essentially1 minute, 25 seconds
a lot of the same mechanisms it seems that were unfolding during 2008 with these credit default swaps. I mean, no1 minute, 33 seconds
one even really heard of that term and then they made a movie about it, The Big Short. Somehow they managed to make a movie about credit default swaps and they actually made it interesting.1 minute, 41 seconds
Basically, people were betting big money that we were about to see a major mortgage collapse um in the United1 minute, 48 seconds
States and something seems to be happening again that just went into effect on April 10th and some big money1 minute, 56 seconds
is going to be moving in a different direction. Can you maybe unpack what is going on here and and am I being a little hyperbolic or not really?2 minutes, 4 seconds
No, I think you're spot on. I'm going to go from like the a very top view. I'm sort of a top down analyst. I'll paint the big picture hopefully in a a2 minutes, 13 seconds
succinct way and kind of drill down to to what you have have spoken about Clayton.2 minutes, 17 seconds
Yeah. And treat me like a fifth grader because well pret pretend I'm in, you know,2 minutes, 23 seconds
elementary school right now and educate me on this because it's a little complicated.2 minutes, 27 seconds
Well, most people feel something is wrong economically but they just can't define it. So inflation is not going2 minutes, 35 seconds
away. It's embedded in the system. And the system requires the basement to2 minutes, 42 seconds
survive. This isn't about predicting a collapse. It's about understanding the direction of the system. The core2 minutes, 49 seconds
message is that sound money equals freedom. Throughout history, when money fails, freedom follows. Fiat currency2 minutes, 56 seconds
system always end the same way. Loss of purchasing power. Gold and silver are not investments first. their money outside of the system. And as you know,3 minutes, 6 seconds
if you don't hold it, you don't own it.3 minutes, 9 seconds
This time is different, but somewhat the same. Debt [clears throat] levels globally are beyond anything in history.3 minutes, 15 seconds
Central banks are trapped. Rates can't stay high, but lower them fuels inflation. So, they're caught between,3 minutes, 22 seconds
as the old expression, the devil and the deep blue sea. They can't go either way.3 minutes, 27 seconds
The market, my view, studied view will take inflation, but interest rates comate with that,3 minutes, 35 seconds
which means they're going higher, not lower. Even though the Fed can set the discount window, the federal funds rate,3 minutes, 42 seconds
and make that lower, the market may say,3 minutes, 45 seconds
"Good for you, but we still require this kind of a rate in order for me to hold on to a dollar longer than, you know, a week, a T- bill, T- note, or T- bond."3 minutes, 55 seconds
Hope that makes sense. we can drill down on that. So, people are waking up just not financially, but politically and socially. And then turn it back over to4 minutes, 2 seconds
you, Clayton. You're right. We're in a setup where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. And this is a time in4 minutes, 10 seconds
history over and over where this huge divide and the gap widens more and more where I hate to say it, but look, it's4 minutes, 17 seconds
my job to tell as it is. I tell them as to see it, especially on programs that have a a reach like yours. That's revolution time. Not that it wasn't4 minutes, 26 seconds
inevitable, but certainly things are leaning that way as we both know. Yeah, we got these Moody's numbers. Um,4 minutes, 33 seconds
it's cut its outlook on US BDC's from stable now to negative. Um, you talk4 minutes, 41 seconds
about the debasement of the currency and our inability to buy things. Um,4 minutes, 48 seconds
you know, our dollar is not, you know,4 minutes, 50 seconds
it's like the you think about the big mac index, right? I think it's the Big Mac index when you look, you know,4 minutes, 55 seconds
internationally like the cost, how much does it cost you to buy a Big Mac and it's it's skyrocketing right now. So,5 minutes, 1 second
this is not going away. So, how then are some of the same mechanisms being put in place on Wall Street that we saw with these credit default swaps in 2008? Like5 minutes, 10 seconds
there there were very smart people that saw what was coming and started to bet against the they started to bet against5 minutes, 19 seconds
the mortgage market. How are you seeing similarities to that right now with some of these mechanisms that these people are putting in place?5 minutes, 28 seconds
Well, what they do is, as you kind of alluded to, they take on first of all,5 minutes, 32 seconds
they see what's coming and they can manipulate the market. Secondly, they put in all kinds of uh financial instruments that give them great leverage. So, you can have an ETF or,5 minutes, 44 seconds
you know, a 2:1 or 3x uh situation. And then lastly, they are working. The Wall Street system is set up for their5 minutes, 52 seconds
benefit, not for yours. And the investment banks are the ones that underwrite most of these uh derivative products that are highly leveraged that6 minutes
give them an advantage. And so what they will usually do is put out information that's contrary to the direction they6 minutes, 7 seconds
want the market to move. They load up during that time frame and then they take it wherever they want. I mean, that's about as simple as I can make it.6 minutes, 15 seconds
People say, "Well, wait a minute. That's a conspiracy theory. But basically, if you study history, the conspiracy side of things is where you should start.6 minutes, 23 seconds
Isn't always perfect, but it actually leads to a much clearer trail of how things work. To sum it up, actually more simply, most of the time any journalist,6 minutes, 32 seconds
be it a financial or such as you,6 minutes, 35 seconds
Natalie, where you cover a broad base of things, if you follow the money, you're usually going to get closer to the truth than any other methodology,6 minutes, 44 seconds
right? And so what sort of information are they putting out right now through their intermediaries like CNBC or6 minutes, 51 seconds
Bloomberg or other individuals? What sort of information are they trying to push to the American people right now for us to believe trying to force us to swallow that isn't true? Do you believe?7 minutes, 3 seconds
Well, first of all, again from the big big picture, I think the one thing to bear in mind at all times is that all wars are banker wars. I mean, most of the news feed has to do around the war,7 minutes, 16 seconds
especially Iran. Of course, the Ukraine thing continues, and the constant beat of the drum is Trump this, Trump that,7 minutes, 24 seconds
and you know, he's about as wishy-washy as anyone's ever been in political history. And on that basis, uh, saying7 minutes, 32 seconds
something positive about oil, move the market up, saying something negative,7 minutes, 35 seconds
move market down, and they're front running those things. So, what am I seeing? I'm seeing signaling from the7 minutes, 43 seconds
insiders into uh the thought of which way is the oil market going to go, which way is the interest rate market going to7 minutes, 51 seconds
go. And of course, they they hold the cards. They know which way it's going to go because they can force the hand any direction they wish. And of course when8 minutes
you especially see following the money an outsized let's say options position that's let's say 10x of normal activity8 minutes, 8 seconds
just before the white house makes a Uturn and all of a sudden the market goes the other direction. So am I seeing8 minutes, 16 seconds
that? Yes. Can I quantified exactly Clayton? I won't. I don't want to get in trouble but nonetheless right I think I've done a fair job of explaining it.8 minutes, 25 seconds
So the mechanism that they've now put in place that Wall Street has launched this time, like we talked about in 2008, it was the bets against the mortgage8 minutes, 34 seconds
market. This time it's now a way to hedge against trouble in the private credit market. And I know this can maybe8 minutes, 43 seconds
go over some people's head, but betting that private credit, so the stuff that's not the big banks,8 minutes, 50 seconds
the private credit is going to start to weaken, is going to start to plummet.8 minutes, 54 seconds
and they're taking bets against private credit. Can you explain why they would bet against private credit? Like what specifically is happening there? What is9 minutes, 2 seconds
private credit and why should like the average American care?9 minutes, 6 seconds
Yeah. Well, uh I'm going to digress a bit here for you, but um9 minutes, 13 seconds
I was at the money show last year uh and it was a panel at the very end of the money show and I'm always there. is9 minutes, 22 seconds
usually it's me and maybe one other that features you know resource stocks resources but primarily gold and silver9 minutes, 29 seconds
and the panel was like the big big picture which you're talking about and the guy to the right of me and I give him credit I can't remember his name forgive me but all he talked about was9 minutes, 38 seconds
private credit and how uh what a big big problem it was but in private credit is9 minutes, 45 seconds
loans made outside of the traditional banking system and instead of a bank making loans loans. It's typically like9 minutes, 53 seconds
an investment fund, a pension fund, a wealth manager,9 minutes, 59 seconds
uh sometimes midsize company, private equity firms, those type of things. So,10 minutes, 3 seconds
in plain English, private credit is Wall Street being replaced,10 minutes, 8 seconds
excuse me, private credit is Wall Street replacing the bank as the lender. So these firms, well, we'll say on the10 minutes, 16 seconds
street, they can be off the street, they could be in, you know, Wisconsin, but they are firms that hold funds that can10 minutes, 23 seconds
loan them out at uh exorbitant rates or for other purposes. And why it exists is because after the 2008 financial crisis,10 minutes, 33 seconds
which is kind of the main theme that we're talking about here, regulators tighten the rules on banks. They required them to hold more capital,10 minutes, 40 seconds
reduce risk, and lend more conservatively. And so, private funds stepped in and took over that gap of people that were, let's say, excessive10 minutes, 49 seconds
gambling uh on these derivative products.10 minutes, 54 seconds
So, they stepped in and filled that gap for whether it's big real estate projects or or otherwise where the banks11 minutes, 1 second
were now really kind of handicapped because of the regulations from 2008. So that sounded like a great thing, right?11 minutes, 8 seconds
Capitalism. We could continue on. People could continue to build, continue to loan money. Money could continue to move. But now it seems like they're very11 minutes, 17 seconds
concerned that that money is going to stop moving. Why would that money stop moving in private equity? And what does that mean for the average American?11 minutes, 27 seconds
I'm going to get to private equity, but first I want to make this statement, but [clears throat] there's nothing really wrong with taking a loan if it's for productive purposes. So, in other words,11 minutes, 36 seconds
if you borrow a dollar and in your business you put that dollar to use and you produce let's say a$12011 minutes, 44 seconds
out of that loan, then obviously that's a productive use of capital.11 minutes, 48 seconds
Unfortunately, at the end of the great inflations, which we're now experiencing, what the federal government does is they take they borrow11 minutes, 57 seconds
a like $2 and they get like a dollars worth of productivity out of it. In other words, they're the faster they're12 minutes, 4 seconds
running, the further they're getting behind. That's true at the federal level. Now, I know you addressed private credit. What's happening in private credit is that reality is shining12 minutes, 13 seconds
through and the sunshine is shining on the fact that a lot of these loans were based on one people that were under capitalized and couldn't pay it back.12 minutes, 21 seconds
Two projects that weren't worth doing in any way, shape or form from the very beginning, i.e. the credit default swaps12 minutes, 29 seconds
which are bets upon bets that were in a mortgage situation with people that couldn't repay the loan. Similar situations here. So they're looking for12 minutes, 37 seconds
higher yields, more return. And what has happened for a long time is that the banks or let's say the private credit12 minutes, 44 seconds
facilities have said, "Oh, well, you can't pay me, Clay. Well, don't worry about it. What I'm going to do is give you an interestonly loan. Loan you more12 minutes, 52 seconds
money so that you can actually pay me the interest back that you owe me, but I provided the money." How sick is that?12 minutes, 58 seconds
But that's the system that we see at the very end. And is it all cases, David Morgan? No, it is not. But that has taken place. So in other words, a lot of13 minutes, 7 seconds
the it sounds very similar to 2008 in a lot of ways. Now I guess I guess it leads to me to the inevitable question,13 minutes, 16 seconds
David, which is, you know, then we were talking specifically about the housing crisis. A lot of people that didn't have jobs were able to get mortgages and the13 minutes, 23 seconds
entire housing market collapsed. What types of projects have these people been getting money to from private credit in order to build?13 minutes, 33 seconds
In other words, as you pointed out,13 minutes, 37 seconds
these were sort of based on sort of faulty promises, I guess. Um, is it commercial real estate? Is there one particular sector or is it is it13 minutes, 46 seconds
completely diverse and we don't have to worry about it?13 minutes, 50 seconds
Well, it goes basically on a hierarchy of investments across the board. So,13 minutes, 55 seconds
what's the number one investment worldwide that's been funible? Well, not fungeable, but been uh one of the best ever, and that's of course land. So,14 minutes, 2 seconds
real estate improved or otherwise that would be primary, but there's many others like uh let's say a bridge loan14 minutes, 11 seconds
for uh taking over a business. So, u let's say doing a merger, that type of thing. I mean, almost anything you could14 minutes, 18 seconds
think of in the financial sector does can be covered by private equity. But you also could take the big big picture14 minutes, 25 seconds
where is the main amount of investments done and that's primarily in real estate. Although there's all kinds of of14 minutes, 32 seconds
things done, the mo main point that I think that our you know viewers need to understand is it's illquid. You can't14 minutes, 40 seconds
easily sell these. These are private loans as I outlined. There is no open market for it. There's no daily pricing14 minutes, 47 seconds
and you're often locked in. So you made a loan to take over this other company and the other company reiged on the deal14 minutes, 54 seconds
or decided not to do it or they found an escape clause or whatever. Now that's dead money. you can't do anything with it. Uh, and the market's masked. I mean,15 minutes, 4 seconds
these loans are not traded. The prices are not visible. And if they fall, uh,15 minutes, 10 seconds
they're not necessarily reported because it's private. So perhaps you put in a $10 bill, as an example, and it's really15 minutes, 18 seconds
worth five, it might carry on the books at 10, and they're not required to say anything of it. Then, well, you put in 10, it's still at 10. when the real15 minutes, 26 seconds
value if you had to liquidate half that price.15 minutes, 29 seconds
That's in fascinating. So these are not public banks. This is all private money15 minutes, 36 seconds
that a lot of it is going to collapse and they're not going to be able to gather up and have these have these15 minutes, 44 seconds
loans wiped off the books. So the federal government normally when you have one of these big banks having a problem, the Fed comes in and saves15 minutes, 52 seconds
them. Do you think there's any backs stop from the from the Fed or from the US Treasury that they're going to come15 minutes, 59 seconds
in and try to bail out all these private equity firms?16 minutes, 4 seconds
Yeah. Well, let me compliment you. I think that's the best question you've asked and we've asked a lot of good ones in my opinion. Uh, possibly. Doubtful.16 minutes, 12 seconds
These are private firms. Now, you know,16 minutes, 14 seconds
there's the whos in the zoo. My favorite expression. I mean, if they're buddy buddy with a invest certain investment bank is very very tight with the Fed,16 minutes, 23 seconds
you know, one of their brethren is working at the Fed or close to it, you could see that happen. I mean, we saw it happen in 2008. We saw what happened Leman Brothers and Bear Sterns. I mean,16 minutes, 34 seconds
Bear was taken out, no doubt about it.16 minutes, 37 seconds
Lehman was was there as well. So, it's kind of a who you know, not what you know situation. So, I can't look you in16 minutes, 44 seconds
the eye and say they will bail them all out or none will be bailed out. I think it'll be again favoritism, non-16 minutes, 53 seconds
capitalism, not equal rights for all. Basically, if you know the right person,16 minutes, 58 seconds
you might get uh subsidized for your failure, which of course is anti-17 minutes, 3 seconds
capitalism. Remember, the right to fail and the right to succeed are the same thing in capitalism. In a true free market, if you do something wealth that17 minutes, 11 seconds
provides a use to you in society, you benefit monetarily and otherwise. If you make a product that you think is the greatest thing since the ripple and the17 minutes, 19 seconds
bobby pin and it doesn't hit the market and you lose money, then you should lose money and move on.17 minutes, 25 seconds
Yeah. So, I guess I'll get you out of here on this, David. How bad do you think this is going to be? And I'll circle back to like my average American question.17 minutes, 35 seconds
you know, the mom and dad that are taking care of their kids, put send them to school, they work two jobs, they each have a job, just trying to put food on17 minutes, 43 seconds
the table. Is this story going to impact them in any kind of appreciable way?17 minutes, 48 seconds
Yeah. When interest rates go higher, as I said earlier, and I believe they will,17 minutes, 52 seconds
that will definitely put a lot of uh problems to the private equity sector,17 minutes, 58 seconds
private private funding. um there will be less and less liquidity which means defaults will continue and they'll go18 minutes, 6 seconds
higher and higher. So the financials starting to see the cracks in this this private system. Uh from a sound money18 minutes, 13 seconds
perspective, it's just another layer of financialization to keep the system going on a lie further than it should.18 minutes, 20 seconds
It represents claims on future cash flow, but most of these things are not cash flowing. They're not real assets. They're they're gains. They're gambles.18 minutes, 29 seconds
And so that depends on confidence and liquidity. There's less and less confidence and there's less and less liquidity. So basically private credit18 minutes, 38 seconds
is inherently bad. It doesn't really serve a true purpose. It's not less transparent. It's very illquid and it's18 minutes, 46 seconds
vulnerable to a lot of stress which you're going to see. It's a yield driven market that grew out of easy money from these private credit facilities and this18 minutes, 55 seconds
thing is going to blow up badly. Is it going to be as bad as 2008? I'll just have to say remains to be determined because no one knows exactly how big it19 minutes, 4 seconds
is and what the cascading effects can be. Uh, a lot of people think, you know,19 minutes, 9 seconds
well, look, I don't own a stock. I've never owned a stock. I don't have a stock account. The stock market doesn't affect me. It does. The stock market19 minutes, 16 seconds
affects everyone because the overall health of the United States, let's say,19 minutes, 21 seconds
corporate entities. So, it's all tied together. It's all connected. and something that appears to be benign19 minutes, 28 seconds
relative to you living in Idaho and some big facility blows up in Florida. Well, that doesn't affect me. You don't know.19 minutes, 36 seconds
Maybe your bank actually got a swap with that other bank. I'm not trying to go drill down too far, Clayton. I'm just trying to explain that uh no one is19 minutes, 44 seconds
exempt from these type of large large system failures.19 minutes, 48 seconds
[sighs and gasps]19 minutes, 49 seconds
David, thank you so much for joining us. the author of the book Second Chance:19 minutes, 54 seconds
How to Make and Keep Big Money from the Coming Gold and Silver Shockwave. Great to have you on the show, David. Really appreciate it.20 minutes, 1 second
My pleasure. Thank you.Sync to video time
Transcript
Chapter 1: Ross Coulthart on assignment in Arizona: This story “is a goodie
4 seconds
welcome to reality check I'm Ross colart on assignment for news nation in America today we're in Arizona on a story I13 seconds
can't tell you about but I can assure you it's a goodie so back in November last year at the soul conference I22 seconds
interviewed Tim gallet a former Admiral in the US Navy and also an oceanographer with the national iic Atmospheric31 seconds
Administration he told me why he believes the UAP coverup is real so today here's an opportunity for you to39 seconds
hear the full interview including sections of the interview we recorded but couldn't air last year because of46 seconds
time I hope you enjoy it Tim gadet has spent a career serving his country firstChapter 2: Who is Tim Gallaudet?
54 seconds
in the Navy working in areas like aircraft carrier combat operations and assisting Navy SEAL Teams during1 minute, 3 seconds
counterterrorism operations according to His official biography more recently he served as acting administrator of the1 minute, 11 seconds
Commerce Department's agency which forecasts weather and monitors ocean and atmospheric conditions where he analyzed1 minute, 20 seconds
the science behind weather and other phenomena so Tim you've said publiclyChapter 3: UFOs are the story of the century
1 minute, 29 seconds
that you think think UFOs uaps are the story of the century now I happen to agree with you but why do you say that1 minute, 37 seconds
oh absolutely we're being visited by non-human intelligence with technology we really don't understand and with1 minute, 44 seconds
intentions we don't understand it all either and this is just one of those great big questions are we alone or not and we're learning we're not now that1 minute, 53 seconds
really does surpris me to hear that from a former very high ranking flag officer in the US Navy to actually say you're stating categor Al that you believe nhi2 minutes, 1 second
non-human intelligence are real absolutely I do why do you say that well for a number of reasons that have been coming out Congress has been informed2 minutes, 10 seconds
and they've drafted legislation and they've passed legislation for example to establish a DOD office to look at it they done the same NASA did the same2 minutes, 17 seconds
with a UAP study team and we know from the UAP hearing this summer uh that there are crash retrieval programs and I2 minutes, 25 seconds
have 100% confidence that the testimony by David grush and the other Witnesses is accurate wow that's a big thing for2 minutes, 33 seconds
you to say that isn't it it is it's astonishing and that's why I wrote that article in the hill I don't understand why more people are are not uh2 minutes, 41 seconds
interested in this I I mystify the lack of intellectual curiosity you know the moment for me was the Schumer amendment2 minutes, 48 seconds
when the house sorry the Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer put into proposed legislation language referring to2 minutes, 56 seconds
non-human intelligence over 20 times exactly that's that's the statement and I Congress doesn't act at that level3 minutes, 6 seconds
without information clearly you believe there's a cover up yes why are they covering it up I mean you're probably3 minutes, 15 seconds
one of the more highly cleared public officials from the military past serving who's basically come out publicly and3 minutes, 22 seconds
said you think this is real why do you think there is this coverup what are they concealing well sure this is technology we're still trying to learn3 minutes, 30 seconds
about and it could give us an advantage in any military conflict and that so that's a good reason to not disclose the3 minutes, 37 seconds
nature of the technology and I think for the foreseeable future we we don't want to uh release and disclose all of the3 minutes, 45 seconds
technology that we've recovered however I think it's about time that we do disclose that we we are in contact with non-human intelligence that that's what3 minutes, 53 seconds
needs to be put out there in the public you very prominently set right behind Ryan graves in the house oversightChapter 4: Gallaudet at the historic 2023 David Grusch UFO hearings in Washington
4 minutes, 2 seconds
hearing earlier this year you made a point of being seen to support Ryan Graves the former fighter pilot David4 minutes, 11 seconds
fraver the former fighter pilot and David grush the former Pentagon intelligence officer for the4 minutes, 18 seconds
ngia why did you take such a public position right well all those officers are speaking out about the phenomena and4 minutes, 27 seconds
and the need to study it scientifically more and and and take policy measures for example Ryan is stood up at a4 minutes, 35 seconds
nonprofit called The Americans for safe Aerospace with a very worthy mission to release more information and get Pilots4 minutes, 43 seconds
to start reporting and really understand the nature of UAP for Aerospace safety what that's a very worthy cause now one4 minutes, 51 seconds
of my jobs in the Navy I was the chief meteorologist of the Navy at the time when Ryan was encountering the UAP off4 minutes, 58 seconds
the US East Co post and and when I saw that these were occurring and I I think it's people know that I received aChapter 5: Gallaudet on the secret military UFO video (‘Go Fast’) he received while serving
5 minutes, 6 seconds
secret email with the goast video attached to it from my boss my boss's operations officer that where I learn5 minutes, 13 seconds
now that these were happening and occurring in in training airspace and causing near midair collisions so that5 minutes, 21 seconds
safety issue is is important and I couldn't believe well I understood why but the Navy didn't do anything about that and they actually pulled back that5 minutes, 30 seconds
email from my computer on the secret Network because of the classification issues that we were just talking about shouldn't there be I mean5 minutes, 37 seconds
philosophically shouldn't it be really important that somebody certainly at your level in the Navy be allowed to talk openly to your colleagues about the5 minutes, 46 seconds
flight safety risks that these kind of things absolutely absolutely this is a safety issue so why do you think they tried to suppress knowledge of that5 minutes, 53 seconds
video well it's the over classification issue that that we've touched on that that these UA p and the Crash retrieval6 minutes, 2 seconds
objects are classified and it's really kind of a cold war Legacy of over classification Tim I have to say I think a lot of people sitting back home will6 minutes, 10 seconds
be scratching their heads going wow a former flag officer in the US Navy a former rear Admiral is talking about the6 minutes, 18 seconds
existence of a non-human intelligence they're probably baffled as to why you've reached that conclusion is there something you know from your brief6 minutes, 27 seconds
briefings as an officer Secret intelligence that you obtained how have you come by this conclusion a few a few6 minutes, 34 seconds
reasons for that Ross first off I had a job where I was the superintendent of the US Naval Observatory and I had a6 minutes, 41 seconds
team of astrophysicists that monitored the stars and made Star cataloges and I learned a lot about astrophysics then6 minutes, 49 seconds
and I came to appreciate how large the universe is and you just cannot conclude when you know that there's 200 to 300 billion stars in our galaxy and there's6 minutes, 57 seconds
hundreds of billions of galaxies to think that we're alone is incredibly arrogant for one and then two as I7 minutes, 4 seconds
mentioned I saw on a secret email the goast video in 2015 I believe and and7 minutes, 12 seconds
then that just I I knew that was not our technology are you disappointed that the US government's not doing more7 minutes, 19 seconds
datadriven Empirical research investigating uaps I I am I I think it's time now and and with the soul7 minutes, 27 seconds
Foundation coming out in this Symposium here this is exactly what we're trying to do is make policy recommendations to the US government to begin more7 minutes, 36 seconds
systematic scientific study of UAP in a number of ways and what soul is looking at is both hard science trying to7 minutes, 43 seconds
acquire some of the materials we have from the crash retrieval program so we can learn more about that technology which could have incredible benefits to society as well as some of the7 minutes, 52 seconds
Humanity's aspects so things like sociology and anthropology and uh and and some of the uh I guess ethics issues8 minutes, 1 second
possibly the problem Tim is that a lot of the government is still in absolute denial I mean you talk as a fact about a crash retrieval program and we'reChapter 6: Why is the government still in absolute denial about Grusch’s claims?
8 minutes, 8 seconds
talking here about retrieved non-human technology aren't we yes and yet there are people in the government like until8 minutes, 16 seconds
very recently the pentagon's spokesperson on uaps Dr Shan Kirkpatrick is still saying he's seen no credible8 minutes, 24 seconds
evidence of this phenomena what do you say to that so what you have going on right now are again Legacy classified program special access8 minutes, 32 seconds
programs and without Congressional Direction and White House policy that's not going to change and so I I don't8 minutes, 41 seconds
criticize for example Sean kir patri because he's just a good soldier doing what he's told to do the people that there has to be legislation so the8 minutes, 48 seconds
Schumer amendment is just a must do and then there has to be uh the White House issuing policy and right now you it's8 minutes, 56 seconds
not coming from Kirk Patrick it's coming from the white house because the dod the Secretary of Defense doesn't do anything that is counter to the White House9 minutes, 5 seconds
policy and they've obviously to me not have decided on a policy of non-disclosure can I ask you this I can understand why it might be decided by9 minutes, 14 seconds
very senior people in the defense department that we shouldn't reveal technology because it's a weapon a potential Weapon It's a potential9 minutes, 22 seconds
advantage in a future War you can understand that count you absolutely I I and I think some of the technology should remain class we don't want it to9 minutes, 30 seconds
get in the hands of our adversaries However the fact that we're being visited by non-human intelligence that is what I think needs to be disclosed9 minutes, 38 seconds
now granted it's not an easy thing for a government to do because then they're going to admit that they don't really know what they are or their intentions and it makes us look vulnerable true but9 minutes, 46 seconds
I think as a society we're ready for this we've turned that corner why is the soul foundation so9 minutes, 52 seconds
important right so we're at a time now where previously UAP have been pretty9 minutes, 58 seconds
much received stigma and skepticism and we're changing that this we're at a inflection point in10 minutes, 7 seconds
our understanding of this phenomena and soul is coming out now to advance the scientific study the education for the10 minutes, 16 seconds
public collaborative sharing of insights from Academia and um and and then policy10 minutes, 23 seconds
recommendations to encourage transparency by our government what sort of research would you like soul to do well I'm of course interested in theChapter 7: What sort of scientific research on UFOs should/can be done now?
10 minutes, 32 seconds
technology aspects of the UAP phenomena that's fascinating to me but there there are other elements again I mean the10 minutes, 38 seconds
social cultural uh I guess implications are great we're not alone this is what10 minutes, 45 seconds
we're learning that that uh that in itself is something worthy of deep and great study you know it's amazing I10 minutes, 52 seconds
think a lot of us watching on would think that somebody at your level of seniority in the US Navy and then in11 minutes
Noah I would have thought you would have been briefed into something like this program oh no no their special access11 minutes, 7 seconds
programs are very tightly restricted and so you have to look at what one's job is and and that that need to know right if11 minutes, 14 seconds
they have a classification or clearance at a certain level and then do they have a need to know those are the two prerequisites in my job as the oceanographer of the Navy for example it11 minutes, 23 seconds
it really wouldn't have made sense for me to have been read into these crash retrieval programs the obvious question then is clearly the11 minutes, 32 seconds
government knows a lot more than it's letting on here's Soul starting out doing virgin research and yet the best11 minutes, 40 seconds
research is probably hidden inside some of these special access programs would you like to see the government sharing more of that data absolutely and that's11 minutes, 48 seconds
the purpose of the Schumer Amendment and and that's what we want to see is we want this panel that it directs to convene and review the these programs11 minutes, 58 seconds
and make a determination on what can be released or disclosed without compromising National Security Tim I don't think it's a12 minutes, 6 seconds
coincidence that the jet fighter pilots who came forward a US Navy there's a lot of US Navy behind the push for12 minutes, 13 seconds
transparency it's the US Navy more switched on to the need for transparency and disclosure on the UAP issue than the12 minutes, 20 seconds
say let's guess the Air Force perhaps well the statistics of disclosure certainly make that the case and you've12 minutes, 28 seconds
we've seen that with Ryan Graves and David David fraver for example Alex Dietrich why is the US Navy different from the US Air Force on disclosure12 minutes, 37 seconds
right well I think Steve uh Pardon Me Chris melon uh wrote an oped I believe it was in Politico but you'll have to check about this about the Air Force not12 minutes, 46 seconds
disclosing at a level like the Navy and I i' I'd speculate but having been in the Navy for 32 years and knowing how12 minutes, 54 seconds
the two Services operate I I think it's safe to say there's there's cultural differences you have a service culture in the Navy that is about going out to13 minutes, 1 second
seea it ships and having to make decisions on your own without higher headquarters permission whereas the Air Force being located at bases primarily13 minutes, 11 seconds
and and so and many of them are are are are in the US uh there's more of a hierarchical mindset and so they are13 minutes, 19 seconds
just afraid to basically make a bold statement about what they know so it's official Sailors are more honest than than I know about honesty but I'll say13 minutes, 28 seconds
they are they're they're less risk averse Tim gallit thanks very much thank you13 minutes, 35 seconds
Ross thanks for watching go to joinin in.com to find newsnation on your13 minutes, 42 seconds
television provider and please don't forget to click that red subscribe button to ensure you get more of news13 minutes, 50 seconds
nation's unbiased and fact-driven news coverageSync to video time
Transcript
Chapter 1: Intro: FBI's Own Evidence Contradicts Their Story
I want you to watch something. This is the FBI's own surveillance footage of the man they say assassinated Charlie Kirk. He allegedly just fired a roughly
8 seconds
4ft 10 lb boltaction rifle from this rooftop. Now watch him jump down and run.14 seconds
Where's the gun?17 seconds
Still don't see it? Neither does anyone else. The FBI has never released footage that clearly shows their suspect24 seconds
carrying the weapon. And somehow that's not even the biggest problem with this story because the bullet they pulled from Charlie's neck doesn't match the32 seconds
gun. The confession everyone keeps talking about. Tyler Robinson never confessed to a single person with a badge. Every so-called admission came40 seconds
from one roommate who conveniently destroyed the original evidence before handing over his phone. Oh, and how47 seconds
about the 26-second gap in the surveillance footage that the FBI is hoping you never ask about? And the security failures that day weren't just56 seconds
incompetent, they were so perfectly catastrophic that you'd almost think someone planned it that way. But here's1 minute, 3 seconds
what really made people stop trusting the story. It wasn't just the evidence. It was the people closest to Charlie.1 minute, 10 seconds
The inner circle that resumed his show the very next day. The fundraising emails that went out before Charlie was in the ground. The colleague who used1 minute, 19 seconds
his death to promote a book and lie about Charlie's views. and the widow who forgave her husband's killer before he1 minute, 27 seconds
was even proven guilty. We're going to get to all of that, but first you need to hear the official version because you1 minute, 34 seconds
can't see how badly a story falls apart until you know what the story is. So,Chapter 2: The Official Narrative They Want You to Believe
1 minute, 39 seconds
let me walk you through what the FBI wants you to believe happened. At 12:23 p.m., Tyler Robinson climbed onto a rooftop 142 yards away from Charlie,1 minute, 49 seconds
fired a single shot from his grandfather's vintage Mouser Model 98 hunting rifle, jumped down about 15 ft,1 minute, 56 seconds
fled on foot, and ditched the rifle wrapped in a dark towel in a nearby wooded area, then immediately texted his2 minutes, 3 seconds
transitioning roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twigs, to confess. They say Robinson left behind shoe impressions, a palm print, a forearm2 minutes, 12 seconds
imprint, DNA samples, and a screwdriver on the rooftop. His DNA was allegedly found on the rifle trigger, the towel,2 minutes, 20 seconds
the fired cartridge casing, and unfired rounds. And they claim he left a pre-written note saying, "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk,2 minutes, 28 seconds
and I'm going to take it." The roommate photographed it before the original was destroyed. They say his father recognized him from the FBI footage,2 minutes, 37 seconds
turned him in, and Robinson was arrested within 33 hours. They're seeking the death penalty, and FBI director Cash2 minutes, 44 seconds
Patel called it a success story of rapid transparency and public collaboration.2 minutes, 50 seconds
But here's the problem. None of it holds up under scrutiny. In late March 2026,Chapter 3: Evidence Against: Ballistics Don't Match
2 minutes, 57 seconds
Robinson's defense filed court documents revealing that the ATF was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr.3 minutes, 7 seconds
Robinson. So, the result was inconclusive, meaning they cannot definitively say that the bullet3 minutes, 15 seconds
fragment came from Tyler Robinson's gun or not. The ballistics evidence, the cornerstone of the entire case, doesn't3 minutes, 24 seconds
match. The report claims that the bullet fragment was too damaged from hitting bone to show clear rifling marks. But here's where it gets really desperate.3 minutes, 34 seconds
Honestly, according to the March 27th defense filing, because the ATF's microscopic ballistic comparison failed,3 minutes, 42 seconds
the FBI is now planning to conduct their own independent analysis.3 minutes, 48 seconds
And guess what tests they're planning to use? compositional bulletled analysis,3 minutes, 54 seconds
which is a forensic technique that the FBI itself officially discontinued in 20054 minutes, 1 second
because it was scientifically unreliable and contributed to wrongful convictions.4 minutes, 9 seconds
Okay, let me say that again. They're resurrecting a test they abandoned 21 years ago because the National Academy4 minutes, 18 seconds
of Science concluded it was flawed and misleading. Bullets from completely different manufacturing batches could4 minutes, 26 seconds
have nearly identical compositions leading to false matches.4 minutes, 33 seconds
And the FBI acknowledged in 2005 that the science didn't support how prosecutors were presenting this4 minutes, 40 seconds
evidence in court. But now that the ATF's modern ballistics test came back inconclusive,4 minutes, 48 seconds
suddenly this discredited method is good enough again. This makes it clear that the FBI will make this match one way or4 minutes, 57 seconds
another. So, you know, when the science doesn't support your case, just change the science, right? And if you're just5 minutes, 6 seconds
now realizing how deep this goes, hit subscribe and like this video because we're about to go even deeper. But5 minutes, 14 seconds
here's what they're really hoping you won't understand. Okay, the spent shell casing did match the rifle's firing pin5 minutes, 22 seconds
marks, and they're acting like this proves Tyler shot Charlie.5 minutes, 27 seconds
It doesn't. They're making a big deal about the spent shell casing found with the rifle, right? See, it matches the firing pin. One shot fired, one bullet5 minutes, 36 seconds
hit Charlie. Case closed. But that does not prove that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk with that rifle. All it5 minutes, 45 seconds
proves is that Tyler's rifle fired one bullet at some point in time. Could have been a week before Charlie's5 minutes, 52 seconds
assassination. Could have been the day before. could have been an hour before Charlie's shooting at a completely different location. Then someone could6 minutes, 2 seconds
have, say, taken the rifle with the spent casing still in the chamber and used it to frame Tyler after Charlie was killed by a completely different weapon.6 minutes, 13 seconds
So, the spent casing doesn't prove Tyler shot Charlie Kirk. It proves Tyler's rifle was fired once at some unknown6 minutes, 21 seconds
time and place. That's it. And so this evidence, right, it sounds really damning in a press conference, but it falls apart under actual scrutiny. But,6 minutes, 33 seconds
okay, maybe you're thinking, fine, the casing alone isn't proof, but surely they can at least prove the shot came from the rooftop, right?6 minutes, 44 seconds
No, they can't. There's no evidence of gunshot residue on the rooftop. No acoustic analysis proving the shot6 minutes, 52 seconds
originated from that exact spot. And there's no gunshot residue analysis from Tyler's hands when he was arrested 337 minutes
hours later. Because while they claim to have found Tyler's shoe impressions, a palm print, a forearm imprint, DNA7 minutes, 7 seconds
samples, and a screwdriver on the rooftop, there is no evidence tying the gun to the roof. meaning they either did7 minutes, 16 seconds
not do any testing for residue on the roof or they did do the testing and they are not sharing the results with the7 minutes, 24 seconds
public. And both of those options seem rather suspicious to me. Many people are asking, where's the detailed trajectory7 minutes, 32 seconds
analysis proving the bullet's path from that specific rooftop position to Charlie's neck? because multiple7 minutes, 40 seconds
eyewitnesses described the shot coming from a different direction than the official rooftop. A lot of us were there.7 minutes, 49 seconds
I think we're the greatest witnesses. I was kind of right in the middle only to the side with Charlie.7 minutes, 55 seconds
Well, I I thought the shot came. No, I don't think so.7 minutes, 59 seconds
I I I'm just I'm That's Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. I appreciate it.8 minutes, 4 seconds
But the FBI has never acknowledged these claims. And when you point all of this out, well, their answer is Tyler's DNA.8 minutes, 13 seconds
So, let's talk about that. They keep hammering on about Tyler's fingerprints and DNA all over the gun, right? Well,8 minutes, 19 seconds
of course they're there. It's his gun,8 minutes, 23 seconds
his grandfather's rifle that he'd handled countless times. If someone broke into my house, stole my gun,8 minutes, 29 seconds
committed a murder, then dumped it wrapped in my towel, my DNA imprints would be all over it, too. That doesn't make me the murderer. The question isn't8 minutes, 38 seconds
whether this was Tyler's gun or whether he'd ever held it. We already know that.8 minutes, 43 seconds
The question is whether Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk in the neck with that gun from the roof of the UVU building on September 10th at 122308.8 minutes, 55 seconds
And so far, we have zero direct forensic evidence proving that. But it actually gets worse because even if you ignore9 minutes, 5 seconds
everything I just said, right? The inconclusive ballistics, the meaningless casing, the DNA on his own gun, the bullet itself doesn't make sense. Yes,9 minutes, 15 seconds
the biggest hole in the story, ironically, is the FBI's smoking gun.Chapter 4: The Physics Problem: Wrong Bullet Damage
9 minutes, 21 seconds
Snipers and hunters immediately debunked the 306 hunting round, saying it should have caused catastrophic damage. Okay,9 minutes, 29 seconds
like a large exit wound, severe tissue disruption. Essentially claiming it would have been a far more gruesome9 minutes, 37 seconds
scene. Many experts recreated the shot using the same distance, same gun type, same ammunition.9 minutes, 44 seconds
Here's another look at the devastation of the 306 from 200 yd away. It's just no way we can believe the narrative that they're telling us.9 minutes, 51 seconds
In between the pork shoulders, I have a beef femur bone. All right, same bullet.9 minutes, 56 seconds
150 grain 30610 minutes, 6 seconds
and the results were undeniable. It was not a recreation of what we witnessed.10 minutes, 12 seconds
Yet photos from the stage showed relatively clean trauma. And the footage from behind Charlie that the FBI did not10 minutes, 20 seconds
want us to see, by the way, revealed no exit wound. meaning the visible damage didn't match a 306 round at 142 yards.Chapter 5: Missing Weapon: Where's the 4-Foot Rifle?
10 minutes, 32 seconds
So, the bullet doesn't match the gun.10 minutes, 35 seconds
The wound doesn't match the bullet. And if that isn't already making you question the narrative, then there's10 minutes, 42 seconds
this. Where's the almost 4 foot long 8 to 10 lb Mouser 98 rifle? Now, some10 minutes, 49 seconds
claim he wrapped it in a dark towel, but even wrapped, that's a massive, awkward object to carry while jumping off a10 minutes, 57 seconds
building and running, right? Others suggest he partially disassembled it, but a Mouser 98 isn't a takedown rifle.11 minutes, 5 seconds
Apparently, that would require tools and time, which you could then argue, well, they found a screwdriver on the roof.11 minutes, 13 seconds
Yes. However, the rifle was recovered assembled. So, if any disassembly11 minutes, 20 seconds
occurred, it would have had to be reassembled before ditching it in the woods. But that kind of falls apart when11 minutes, 27 seconds
the tool allegedly used to disassemble it was left behind on the roof, right?Chapter 6: Timeline Gap: Missing Footage
11 minutes, 34 seconds
Okay. So, maybe we just can't see the gun or it's disassembled during the FBI rooftop footage. But what about the11 minutes, 42 seconds
missing footage? People immediately began questioning this footage because the footage begins when the alleged shooter is already running over 2011 minutes, 50 seconds
seconds after the shot. And here's what makes this even more suspicious. Okay,11 minutes, 56 seconds
the original security camera is a fixed wide-angle CCTV camera with a broad field of view covering that entire12 minutes, 5 seconds
rooftop area. And the FBI released a heavily zoomed in, digitally panned version that only shows the escape. But12 minutes, 13 seconds
if that wide-angle camera captured the shooter running and jumping, it logically should have also recorded him12 minutes, 20 seconds
setting up, lying prone in the firing position and taking the shot. The FBI had to manually zoom and track the12 minutes, 28 seconds
suspect in post-prouction, which means they have the full raw footage. So, why12 minutes, 36 seconds
won't they show us the part where he's actually shooting? If they have footage of Tyler Robinson firing the shot that killed Charlie Kirk, the footage12 minutes, 44 seconds
everyone is doubting exists, why not just release it and end all speculation?12 minutes, 50 seconds
But instead, they give us a zoomedin clip starting after the most important moment.12 minutes, 57 seconds
Now, I'm not going to lie, that really doesn't feel like transparency. Cash Patel. It's feeling awfully selective.13 minutes, 5 seconds
So, where was he for those critical 20 plus seconds? And why does their own surveillance footage have this gap? ByChapter 7: No Real Confession: All Evidence is Hearsay
13 minutes, 14 seconds
now, I'm sure you have seen countless people in the media, law enforcement,13 minutes, 18 seconds
etc. claim that it is ridiculous to question this narrative because Tyler Robinson confessed to shooting Charlie Kirk. Right?13 minutes, 28 seconds
Wrong. Because here's what they really don't want you to know.13 minutes, 32 seconds
Tyler Robinson has never confessed directly to police in a recorded interview, on video, or in court. He13 minutes, 41 seconds
maintains his innocence. Every confession is third-party hearsay. The13 minutes, 48 seconds
handwritten note, well, only Lance Twig saw it before it was destroyed. The text messages, only Lance Twig's phone13 minutes, 56 seconds
records, which were voluntarily provided by him. the family statements, pure hearsay from people who turned him in,14 minutes, 4 seconds
Discord messages, screenshots that were provided by others, and one of the most repeated lines is that Tyler's father14 minutes, 10 seconds
recognized him from FBI photos and turned him in. But that's not what actually happened. The widely repeated story is based entirely on hearsay.14 minutes, 22 seconds
Statements the parents allegedly made to police relayed through court filings.14 minutes, 27 seconds
There is no direct quote or recording from Matt Robinson himself. Here's what actually happened. According to Washington County Sheriff Nate Brooksby,14 minutes, 37 seconds
at exactly 8:02 on the 11th, I received a call from a friend of mine who happens to be a retired detective that worked14 minutes, 45 seconds
for me for many years. Um, I didn't put that out there initially. I wanted to protect that individual as much as possible. Um, unfortunately in the court14 minutes, 54 seconds
documents, which is standard, uh, he was referenced as a retired Washington County deputy. So, I didn't put that out15 minutes, 1 second
there. It was in the court docs. I was trying to protect even that information and just saying retired law enforcement in general. So, so I get a call from my15 minutes, 9 seconds
friend and his his said, "Hey, how you doing?" Good. Good. And it's not, you know, he's been retired a few years. He he'll we'll call each other. It's not15 minutes, 17 seconds
it's not unusual for me to get a call from him or vice versa. And at uh 8:02 p.m. he calls me. Hey, I can tell his15 minutes, 26 seconds
voice is kind of shaky. So my first thought is who who died? Like who who's who's he going to tell me that died? And then uh and then I can't I couldn't15 minutes, 33 seconds
fathom what actually came out of his mouth. So he said, "Hey, um I know who I know who Charlie Kirk Shooter is. Um, I15 minutes, 42 seconds
I know the family through religious association and uh he's in he's in Washington County15 minutes, 49 seconds
now and we're working on trying to get him to come in voluntarily. During that phone call um some information was15 minutes, 57 seconds
provided about Tyler uh potentially having some suicidal ideations was in or out to a remote area Washington County.16 minutes, 5 seconds
Um the parents convinced him not to do that and uh you know conveyed that they would uh you know stand by him and help him help him u surrender peacefully.16 minutes, 16 seconds
So it wasn't just daddy seeing son on the news and calling the FBI. It was a coordinated16 minutes, 24 seconds
peaceful surrender through an alleged family friend in law enforcement.16 minutes, 32 seconds
It's a very different story, right? And that family friend in law enforcement has raised some questions amongst independent investigators.16 minutes, 42 seconds
Who exactly is this person? And why did the sheriff want to keep his identity hidden?16 minutes, 50 seconds
To be clear, there was no Miranda wave statement, no police interview recording, no body cam footage of aChapter 8: The Alleged "Text" Messages
16 minutes, 57 seconds
confession. So, if Tyler never confessed, what exactly does the prosecution have? Well, basically text17 minutes, 6 seconds
messages. That's their smoking gun. A thread between Tyler and his roommate,17 minutes, 12 seconds
transitioning lover Lance Twigs. And honestly, when these messages went public, people were immediately put off by them. Odd phrasing, mixed voices,17 minutes, 23 seconds
kind of like strange tone shifts. The public's reaction to them was a kind of like a nice bit of comedic relief,17 minutes, 29 seconds
honestly, because that is really what these messages were, comedy. Why have I committed this act? It was the hate of17 minutes, 37 seconds
the man. Reason had no purchase in the poor soil of his soul. You have not asked, but in case you were wondering17 minutes, 44 seconds
where I hid the rifle, my love, it was over yonder by that lingering squad car.17 minutes, 50 seconds
They read like a weird mix of Shakespeare and like internet lingo with some law enforcement terms like17 minutes, 58 seconds
sprinkled throughout, you know, like vehicle and squad car. Tyler Robinson is an objectively smart young man, a good student. Would he really write out his18 minutes, 6 seconds
exact criminal actions in detail? To blatantly describe the weapon he was trying to hide, saying, "Only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel."18 minutes, 18 seconds
Are we really supposed to believe that?18 minutes, 20 seconds
And here's the question nobody's answering. How do we know these messages were actually sent by Tyler to Lance? We18 minutes, 29 seconds
have only seen a clean typed out transcript formatted like a script with lines labeled Robinson and Twigs with no18 minutes, 38 seconds
timestamps, no delivery red receipts, no phone metadata, and no native messaging app layout. Any screenshots of the18 minutes, 46 seconds
messages that we've seen like on social media have been recreations, not the actual evidence. People have pointed out18 minutes, 53 seconds
the messages seem out of order, like someone was typing things they were told to send but accidentally swapped them around. It also feels a bit like someone19 minutes, 2 seconds
was checking off a list of things the messages needed to say for the prosecution's case, like Twigs asking him how long he had been planning it.19 minutes, 14 seconds
That doesn't seem like an organic question, right? But it does seem like someone trying to lock in that it was19 minutes, 23 seconds
indeed premeditated. Tyler also claimed in the text that the rifle was very unique and that his father recognized19 minutes, 30 seconds
it, but the release photo does not strike most people as particularly special. And this is yet another reason19 minutes, 38 seconds
these messages seem like they were checking boxes. It feels a little like a to-do list, right? Like rifle left in19 minutes, 46 seconds
woods wrapped in towel, check. Changed clothes, check. Planned the shooting for over a week, check. I hate Charlie Kirk and use internet lingo, check. Dad19 minutes, 55 seconds
easily recognized the rifle, check. Dad was MAGA, check. I'm going to turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Check.20 minutes, 4 seconds
If Lance was told to look under my keyboard for a note, that suggests he had access to Tyler's computer. If he20 minutes, 13 seconds
had Tyler's password, let's say, he could have sent those messages from Tyler's iMessage account to his own20 minutes, 20 seconds
phone and responded. And it is worth mentioning, it is awfully convenient that the one piece of evidence in these20 minutes, 28 seconds
communications between Tyler and Lance that would have had Tyler's DNA and fingerprints on it, the alleged note20 minutes, 34 seconds
that was hidden under the keyboard was destroyed. But Lance made sure to take a photo of it before destroying it.20 minutes, 45 seconds
Why wouldn't he have just kept it if he wanted to have proof of it?20 minutes, 49 seconds
Kind of odd, right? So, you can see why some theorize that Lance or someone helping him may have been coached on20 minutes, 58 seconds
what to say or include. It just feels very fake, and it is the biggest piece of evidence for the prosecution's case.21 minutes, 8 seconds
But prosecutors say the full forensic extraction from Lance's phone with carrier metadata confirms the order and21 minutes, 15 seconds
timing. But that raw data has never been publicly released. All we've ever seen is the cleaned up transcript. So, we're21 minutes, 24 seconds
just supposed to trust them. And honestly, that seems to be the theme of this entire case. Trust us. Trust the21 minutes, 32 seconds
text. Trust the DNA. Trust the ballistics. Trust that a 22-year-old acted alone.Chapter 9: Coordinated Distractions: Two Decoy Suspects
21 minutes, 40 seconds
But it's really hard to trust the lone shooter narrative when there were not one but two decoys at the scene that the21 minutes, 49 seconds
FBI would really love for you to forget about. Within minutes of the shooting, George Zinn, decoy number one,21 minutes, 57 seconds
approached an officer yelling, "I shot him, now shoot me." Do you remember? He was that old man we saw being dragged away with his pants falling down. Yeah.22 minutes, 7 seconds
Immediately suspicious. Well, he was taken to a hospital where police discovered over 20 images of CSAM on his22 minutes, 16 seconds
phone. He later said he falsely confessed to help the real shooter escape. But some hospital sources22 minutes, 23 seconds
reportedly told Candace Owens that he mentioned being paid to create the distraction.22 minutes, 30 seconds
So, we potentially have a coordinated paid distraction involving someone with serious criminal behavior.22 minutes, 39 seconds
Hm. And maybe we could have bought that he was just one weirdo, right? But then Cash Patel tweeted they had the suspect22 minutes, 47 seconds
in custody at 4:21 p.m. and then corrected himself 2 hours later saying the person was released. That subject22 minutes, 56 seconds
was Zachariah Ahmed Koreshi. He was reportedly standing in line to ask a question about 20 to 25 ft away from23 minutes, 3 seconds
Charlie when the shot was fired. And after the chaos, he left the venue and went back to his apartment in Provo,23 minutes, 9 seconds
where police and FBI then came and detained him for questioning. Now, no clear public explanation has ever been23 minutes, 16 seconds
given for why he specifically was chosen out of everyone in the crowd. Law enforcement and the Utah Department of Public Safety have only said he was23 minutes, 25 seconds
taken in as a person of interest and released after interrogation with no ties to the shooting. Kind of weird,23 minutes, 32 seconds
right? Some believe that he was a planned decoy because it just doesn't add up. Why would they single him out of23 minutes, 39 seconds
the crowd as a suspect? While this could be written off as just another massive mistake by Cash Patel, many see this as23 minutes, 48 seconds
another distraction because claiming to have the suspect would inherently slow the active manhunt, buying time for the23 minutes, 57 seconds
real shooter to escape. And the security failures were so beyond incompetent that it is not hard to believe they must haveChapter 10: Security Failures: Too Perfect to be Incompetence
24 minutes, 6 seconds
been coordinated. Brian Harpole, head of Charlie Security, revealed they were explicitly banned from using drones for24 minutes, 14 seconds
overhead sweeps due to FAA restrictions near Provo airport and campus rules.24 minutes, 20 seconds
I spent thousands of dollars on drones last year and one and got the guy's license. But if the area lies in the Provo, Utah airspace,24 minutes, 31 seconds
I can't fly it. That's a 107B the guy.24 minutes, 34 seconds
We can't break the rules, right? And then you had secondary restrictions probably due to heavy foot traffic for the school. But I I can't go in and24 minutes, 42 seconds
break the rules. There's laws for a reason. And then and so now the school could have flown drones, the PD, but they didn't have them.24 minutes, 53 seconds
But Frank Turk, Charlie's mentor who was with him that day, said Charlie was looking at drone footage on his phone25 minutes, 1 second
showing the crowd building up when they were on their way to the venue. way in.25 minutes, 4 seconds
We had drone footage of the crowd building and um had Charlie had it on his phone. I said,25 minutes, 14 seconds
"Charlie, I don't like this place. There are too many buildings."25 minutes, 19 seconds
Charlie just kind of brushed it off because look, we have a security team and he wasn't going to cancel an event.25 minutes, 27 seconds
And as far as we knew,25 minutes, 31 seconds
the university police were there and they would scout out the place.25 minutes, 35 seconds
So they could use drones for social media, but not security at an outdoor event surrounded by tall buildings with exposed rooftops. Now,25 minutes, 46 seconds
watch this clip of Brian Harpole explaining his coordination with UVU police. Does this sound like the police25 minutes, 53 seconds
confirmed they would be handling it or does this sound like a loose end that nobody actually secured?26 minutes, 1 second
On Monday before this correspondence went to Chief Long.26 minutes, 6 seconds
Hello Chief Long. We received this message today from the student group. Um there is a student roof access pretty26 minutes, 13 seconds
close to where CK will be set up at the Utah Valley. uh the Sorenson uh center has a couple of staircases that go up to26 minutes, 21 seconds
walkways on the roofs and he comes back he says you want uh access to the roof and came back and said uh I was told26 minutes, 30 seconds
students have access above us if this is true it would be nice to either have it26 minutes, 37 seconds
controlled access or allow one of my guys to be there as well if possible. He26 minutes, 45 seconds
comes back and his last correspondence was, "I got you covered."26 minutes, 55 seconds
What else am I to do?26 minutes, 57 seconds
Now, it's important to note there were no metal detectors, no bag checks, no checkpoints. Attendees walked straight27 minutes, 4 seconds
in with no screening. Multiple witnesses were shocked considering Charlie's high profile and the scale of the event. UVU27 minutes, 13 seconds
only assigned six campus police officers for a major political event. Why?27 minutes, 19 seconds
Because TPUSA's official event request form described it as routine student debate about culture, American values,27 minutes, 27 seconds
and freedom, downplaying any high-risk elements. They also declined additional emergency medical services, so there was27 minutes, 36 seconds
no paramedic on site. Charlie had been known to wear bulletproof vests at events in the past, but allegedly27 minutes, 43 seconds
refused to wear one that day. Why? But perhaps most suspicious were the hand signals. Watch this footage carefully.27 minutes, 53 seconds
How many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? Counting or not counting gang violence.27 minutes, 59 seconds
Grant, do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? Counting or not counting gang violence?28 minutes, 8 seconds
11. It's five. Okay. Now, five is a lot,28 minutes, 10 seconds
right? I'm going to give you I'm going to give you some credit. Do you do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years? Counting or not counting gang violence?28 minutes, 19 seconds
Great.28 minutes, 21 seconds
Charlie's security team appears to be making coordinated gestures right before and after the shot. Brian Harpull denied28 minutes, 29 seconds
this, claiming they use radios to communicate, not hand signals. As if that means anything. But watch it for yourself. Does this seem normal to you?28 minutes, 39 seconds
Mashers there have been in America over the last 10 years. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.28 minutes, 46 seconds
Keep in mind this is a security team that is paid very well for protection.28 minutes, 51 seconds
Yet every single protocol failed simultaneously.28 minutes, 58 seconds
And here's maybe the biggest mistake that the FBI has made. It's how fast they locked onto Tyler as the sole29 minutes, 5 seconds
suspect. Within 24 hours, suspect identified. Within 33 hours, arrest made. Within days, case declared closed,29 minutes, 15 seconds
death penalty sought. Real investigations take months to build solid cases. But they had tunnel vision29 minutes, 24 seconds
from day one. Joe Kent, former director of the National Counterterrorism Center,29 minutes, 29 seconds
revealed he was blocked from investigating potential foreign connections right after Robinson's29 minutes, 35 seconds
arrest despite having leads. Kent has gone public saying he'd be willing to testify on behalf of the defense if29 minutes, 44 seconds
called, even if it helps Robinson because there was still a lot for us to look into.29 minutes, 52 seconds
Now, why shut down investigation lines if you're confident in your own case?29 minutes, 59 seconds
And why is a former counterterrorism director willing to testify for the alleged shooter?Chapter 11: The Real Motive: Charlie's Changing Views on Israel
30 minutes, 8 seconds
But let's say Tyler somehow overcame all these physical and logistical impossibilities, right? Let's say he really did pull off this precision30 minutes, 16 seconds
assassination. The FBI wants you to believe his motive was simple. He hated Charlie Kirk's politics and wanted to30 minutes, 24 seconds
stop his hate. So, we're supposed to believe Tyler Robinson, an objectively smart young man, good student, no history of violence or mental30 minutes, 32 seconds
instability, was ready to throw his entire life away, either life in prison or the death penalty, all to take out30 minutes, 40 seconds
one conservative commentator. While the left's reaction to Charlie's death was indeed horrific and disturbing,30 minutes, 49 seconds
the question isn't whether leftists wanted Charlie dead, because plenty clearly did. The question is why now?30 minutes, 58 seconds
Why September 10th, 2025? Why not a year earlier when Charlie was saying the same things? Why not 6 months later? What31 minutes, 6 seconds
made that specific moment so critical that someone was willing to orchestrate an assassination?31 minutes, 13 seconds
And the answer isn't political hatred.31 minutes, 16 seconds
It's something much bigger. Let me tell you why Charlie Kirk really had to go.31 minutes, 22 seconds
In June 2025, Charlie was in the Oval Office during the Iran crisis. Israeli intelligence was telling Trump that Iran31 minutes, 30 seconds
could assemble a bomb in 15 days. The pressure was immense for fullcale war.31 minutes, 37 seconds
Charlie convinced Trump to resist the push for full-scale war. Operation Midnight Hammer took out the nuclear facilities, but then President Trump31 minutes, 46 seconds
stopped. No regime change, no endless war. And Charlie went on his show and called it a victory.31 minutes, 53 seconds
There's no boots on the ground. There is no endless war. There's no regime change. There is no change in the hearts of minds. There is no consensus changing32 minutes, 1 second
war. There is no Iraq. There is no Afghanistan. There is no Syria. There is no Libya. Instead, President Trump has charted a third way. No nuclear program,32 minutes, 9 seconds
no dead US troops, no regime change, no long endless war. We accomplished two things. No nukes,32 minutes, 18 seconds
and no endless wars. Joe Kent again,32 minutes, 22 seconds
former director of National Counterterrorism Center, revealed Charlie's last words to him in the West Wing. And the last time I saw Charlie32 minutes, 29 seconds
Kirk on this earth was in in June um in in the in the West Wing in the stairway.32 minutes, 36 seconds
And I said hi to him and he looked me in the eye and he said very loudly and it's a small you've been in the West Wing.32 minutes, 41 seconds
It's it's small uh it's a tight space and and he said,32 minutes, 44 seconds
"Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran." Very loudly. He was single-minded.32 minutes, 49 seconds
And he walked off and he went, I believe, into the oval.32 minutes, 51 seconds
Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran. Israel and American neocons had been pushing for a US war with Iran32 minutes, 59 seconds
for over 30 years because billions in weapon sales, regime change, and regional dominance all depended on33 minutes, 7 seconds
American military action. But Charlie stood in the way. Effectively, he was33 minutes, 14 seconds
able to influence Trump in a way that most were not. And now, 7 months after his death, look where we are. full war33 minutes, 23 seconds
with Iran, costing billions of dollars and a growing number of American lives.33 minutes, 29 seconds
But stopping the Iran war wasn't his only crime. Charlie had been changing and powerful people noticed.33 minutes, 36 seconds
If you call everyone an anti-semite if they don't take a puritanical view of the Netanyahu government, then I think that's it's bad for everybody.33 minutes, 47 seconds
He had historically been a pro-Israel Christian Zionist, right? But in his final months, he was shifting. In July33 minutes, 54 seconds
2025, he hosted Tucker Carlson at a TPUSA event where Charlie encouraged Tucker to go Max knowing it would hurt his reputation with donors.34 minutes, 4 seconds
And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say34 minutes, 12 seconds
that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that.34 minutes, 24 seconds
Tucker proclaimed Jeffrey Epstein was working for MSAD, questioned how billionaires like Bill Aman got their money, and questioned Apac's influence34 minutes, 33 seconds
over politicians. Charlie also refused to condemn Candace Owens despite massive pressure from donors and friends. He was34 minutes, 42 seconds
allegedly planning to invite Candace to speak at Afest in December 2025, which was upsetting donors even more. And it's34 minutes, 50 seconds
worth noting Charlie's criticism of Israel didn't start in 2025. He questioned the October 7th narrative34 minutes, 57 seconds
back in 2023, asking if there was indeed a standown order in place. I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a standown order?35 minutes, 8 seconds
Was there a standown order?35 minutes, 10 seconds
6 hours. I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New South New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's 45 minutes. Wow.35 minutes, 20 seconds
6 hours. They're live streaming the killing of Jews. Was Did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate nonconspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF.35 minutes, 33 seconds
The essence is this. This is the closest thing to the Holocaust any of us have lived through. But the fact is now BB and the Israeli hard-right government has a mandate.35 minutes, 44 seconds
I got to be careful the way I say this to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.35 minutes, 50 seconds
He later tweeted confirmation that Hamas's plans had been known in advance. Two days before his assassination,Chapter 12: Financial Pressure: $2M Donors and Netanyahu's Alleged Offer
35 minutes, 57 seconds
Charlie sent this message in a group chat with nine people. Confirmed real by TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kovette. Just36 minutes, 5 seconds
lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting36 minutes, 12 seconds
Candace. Jewish donors play into all these stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no36 minutes, 21 seconds
choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.36 minutes, 26 seconds
$2 million per year from one donor. But it gets bigger. Sources say that36 minutes, 34 seconds
allegedly Benjamin Netanyahu personally offered to take TPUSA to the next level.36 minutes, 40 seconds
Now TPUSA was already a $150 million company. So we're talking potentially36 minutes, 47 seconds
billions with a capital B. But Charlie turned it down. So, if billions of36 minutes, 54 seconds
dollars were on the table and the only thing standing in the way was Charlie Kirk's conscience, isn't that a bigger37 minutes, 2 seconds
motive than some 22-year-old's political hatred?Chapter 13: Conclusion: So here's what we know...
37 minutes, 7 seconds
So, here's what we know. The ballistics don't match. The physics don't work. And Tyler never actually confessed to37 minutes, 14 seconds
police. Every confession is third-party hearsay. And these aren't the only things they're hoping you won't notice.37 minutes, 21 seconds
They also hope you won't notice the inner circle that resumed Charlie's show the very next day. The fundraising emails that went out before Charlie was37 minutes, 30 seconds
in the ground and of course the widow who forgave her husband's killer before he was proven guilty. They want us to37 minutes, 38 seconds
accept their narrative and to just move on to stop asking questions. To trust the same institutions that have lied to37 minutes, 45 seconds
us for decades. To buy the left versus right narrative that they spoonfed us. But we're not going to do that.37 minutes, 53 seconds
Charlie's public execution woke something up in many people. And I am one of them. And even though most of the38 minutes, 2 seconds
public doesn't have the time or energy to meticulously follow along with the countless independent investigations,38 minutes, 9 seconds
I do and I have been watching very closely. And in my next video, I'm going to show you the pattern of coordinated38 minutes, 17 seconds
lies, suspicious behavior, and the people who benefited most from his silence. If this video helped you understand the holes in the FBI narrative, please like it and share it,38 minutes, 27 seconds
and make sure to subscribe because in the next video, we're going even deeper.38 minutes, 32 seconds
The truth about who killed Charlie Kirk will come out and it's going to change everything. And let me tell you, my38 minutes, 40 seconds
pattern recognition over the last 5 years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know,38 minutes, 49 seconds
Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right.38 minutes, 57 seconds
Thanks for watching.Sync to video time
Transcript
0:04
4 seconds
TARGETED, MORE DANGEROUS. HAVE INVESTIGATORS GOTTEN THAT FAR TO MAKE CONNECTIONS AND RUN BY SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN TRACKING EVERY ONE OF THESE STORIES12 seconds
CONNECTING THE DOCTOR SELF ASKING THE QUESTIONS AND OTHERS ART. LOS ANGELES MAGAZINE CONTRIBUTOR LAUREN COMMON. GREAT TO SEE YOU20 seconds
AGAIN. NOT WEARING DRESS, TONY. FIND OUT WHO IS THIS GUY? GARCIA, STEVEN GARCIA, MAN, JESSE, THIS ONE IS27 seconds
CHILLING TO ME BECAUSE AS YOU SAID, IT ECHOES MIAMA CASON'S DISAPPEARANCE RIGHT DOWN TO SAME THING. SAME THING, THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. SO.36 seconds
>> STEVEN GARCIA, I MEAN, HE HAD A TOP SECURITY CLEARANCE AT KCNA, SAYS THAT IS A PURSE SOURCE. NO SOURCE SAID THAT44 seconds
PURSE OR YES, PER SOURCE THAT WAS CLOSE TO GARCIA. >> BUT LOOK WHERE HE WORKED AT KCNA. SEE ANY BAIT52 seconds
MANUFACTURER. 80 1% OF NON NUCLEAR COMPONENTS THAT GO INTO BUILDING MILITARY NUCLEAR WEAPONS. AND I MEAN, HE OVERSAW TENS OF MILLIONS OF1 minute, 1 second
DOLLARS OF ASSE, EQUIPMENT, SOME CLASSIFIED, SOME NOT. I MEAN, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE SKIEIES HAD1 minute, 8 seconds
RIGHT. THE OFFICIALS HAD SAID THAT HE MAY HAVE BEEN A DANGER TO HIMSELF. HE WAS SEEN CARRYING A GUN. AND IT SOUNDS1 minute, 16 seconds
CRAZY. BUT BETWEEN GARCIA AND GENERAL MCCASLIN, I HAVE TO WONDER AND AGAIN, I KNOW THIS SOUNDS CRAZY, BUT IT COULD BE1 minute, 23 seconds
AN OPTION HERE. I MEAN, IS, IS THE GOVERNMENT DOING THIS? ARE ARE THEY TAKING OUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE BECAUSE OF X, Y Z AND1 minute, 31 seconds
WAIT. I WANT TO POINT SOMETHING ELSE MIND LITERALLY ON ROLL ON A ROLL. BUT TOMORROW, APRIL 14TH, THAT IS1 minute, 39 seconds
ONE RAPANA LUNA DAVE PETE HEGSETH. THIS DEADLINE SHE REQUESTED. 46, YOU AP VIDEOS AND AND LOOK, THERE'S A GOOD1 minute, 47 seconds
REASON BEHIND IT. I MEAN, THESE VIDEOS SHE DETAILED IN IN THIS FILING AND THEY SAY, YOU KNOW, IRAN X, Y Z DATE,1 minute, 56 seconds
YOU KNOW 2022 SYRIA X Y Z DATE SHAPED LIKE A CIGAR. YOU KNOW WHAT THIS IS. THIS IS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY. AND AND2 minutes, 4 seconds
THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IN REAL TIME, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S IN THE SKY. WE DON'T2 minutes, 10 seconds
KNOW IF THIS SOME KIND YOU KNOW, YOU AP. WE DON'T KNOW IF IT'S A DRONE. WE JUST WE DON'T2 minutes, 19 seconds
KNOW GETTING ANY OFFICIAL WORD FROM AUTHORITIES. INVESTIGATORS THAT ARE MAYBE TRYING TO LINK THESE 10 EPISODES. ARE THEY ALL2 minutes, 26 seconds
DISCONNECTED THE SAYING YOU CAN'T MAKE A CONNECTION BECAUSE AGAIN, ANYTHING GET LATER VERY WELL THERE. ARE YOU OR YOUR EERIE SIMILARITIES? OF2 minutes, 34 seconds
COURSE THERE ARE. YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. AND I'VE YOU KNOW, I'VE REACHED OUT TO REP OR A LISCENSE OFFICE RUPPERT AT OFFICE. AND I DID HEAR BACK FROM BURLESON OFFICE LAST2 minutes, 42 seconds
WEEK. AND LOOK, THEY SAID, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVEN'T HEARD DIRECTLY FROM THE WHITE HOUSE THEY HAVEN'T BROUGHT UP GENERAL MCCASKILL'S DISAPPEARANCE AT ALL.2 minutes, 51 seconds
>> IF THEY WERE BEING VERY SAFE WITH ME, I WANT TO SAY, ROBERT, ITS OFFICE DIDN'T RESPOND TO ME AT ALL, BUT BERT. IT JUST SAID I FORGET2 minutes, 58 seconds
WHAT SHOW HE WAS ON. BUT HE JUST SAID HE TALKED TO QUOTE, FOLKS AT THE WHITE HOUSE ABOUT THIS AND THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP3 minutes, 5 seconds
IS ABOUT TO DO SOME DISRUPTING. I JUST DON'T BELIEVE OBAMA TRIED TO RELEASE THESE UFO FILES. CLINTON TRIED TO RELEASE THEM. NOTHING HAPPENED. I GET IT. PEOPLE3 minutes, 14 seconds
THINK TRUMP IS DIFFERENT, BUT BUT WHAT'S SO DIFFERENT? I MEAN, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT TO BEGIN ANY CALL THAT THEY GET ANY3 minutes, 24 seconds
MESSAGES BECAUSE JUST TO LEAVE THE HOUSE ALLEGEDLY ARMED MOM AND SUCH A STRANGE EVEN WHEN THE CASTLE AND THERE IS LEDGE THAT THERE'S AN ALLEGATION3 minutes, 32 seconds
THAT HE DIDN'T WANT TO BE FOUND AN INCH. >> ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT THEY WERE UP TO IN THE DAYS, WEEKS, HOURS BEFORE. SO THERE THERE3 minutes, 40 seconds
IS NOTHING PUBLIC. AND I MEAN, I AM DIGGING RIGHT NOW. I YOU KNOW, IT'S IT'S TOUGH. YOU YOU WANT TO REACH OUT TO FAMILY MEMBERS. YOU WANT TO REACH OUT3 minutes, 48 seconds
TO FRIENDS, BUT YOU WANT TO DO IT. >> AND IN, YOU KNOW, IN A WAY THAT'S NOT SO INVASIVE. I MEAN, THEIR THESE >> THEIR FFFFFFFFFFFFILILMEMEER WRITING. THIS IS VERY SERIOUS.3 minutes, 55 seconds
AND, YOU KNOW, I SAW FACEBOOK POST EVEN GARCIA'S. I THINK IT WAS HIS NIECE WHO WAS LIKE, HAS ANYONE SEEN MY UNCLE JUST BEGGING PLEADING AND SO YOU4 minutes, 3 seconds
REALLY HAVE TO THINK ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE THE PROTECTIONS FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS AS WELL THERE. THERE'S SO MUCH THAT THAT NEEDS TO BE SAID AN AND4 minutes, 11 seconds
IT'S JUST IT'S IT'S TERRIBLE. YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW THE ANSWER THEY KNOW EACH OTHER THAT ANY OF THESE PEOPLE KNOW EACH OTHER WORK TOGETHER IN THE4 minutes, 19 seconds
SAME, THEN DIAGRAM. I MENTION NEW MEXICO TOGETHER. BUT RIGHT. WELL, WE DISCUSSED LAST WE DISCUSS MONICA ARAIZA4 minutes, 27 seconds
WORKED ALONGSIDE OR UNDERNEATH ME. I'M A CATHOLIC AND THEY AND AT WRIGHT PATTERSON. >> SO THERE IS A CONNECTION THERE. YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T4 minutes, 37 seconds
MADE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ANY OF THE OTHERS JUST YET. I YOU KNOW, KNOW THAT IT IS INTERESTING, CARL GROW. MAYOR,4 minutes, 45 seconds
I'VE BEEN LOOKING INTO HIS DEATH A CAL TECH ASTROPHYSICIST. I DID NOTICE SOME NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA AND HE LIVES IN A VERY REMOTE4 minutes, 53 seconds
AREA. THEY ALSO WORKED IN AEROSPACE RESEARCH, WHICH, AGAIN, I AM. I WISH I HAD ALL DAY TO FOCUS ON THIS STORY.4 minutes, 59 seconds
JESSE, I REALLY DO BUT I'LL GET THERE. I WILL. IT'S NOT GOING ANYWHERE. IT'S NOT GOING5 minutes, 7 seconds
ANYWHERE. IT'S BEING AMPLIFIED AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN BECAUSE THIS IS SO STRANGE5 minutes, 12 seconds
THATSync to video time
Nothing Excites Me Anymore: Brain Health, Motivation, and Recovery
Robert R. Motta • POTUS 48 Campaign Education Module
There is a growing public hunger for practical neuroscience that explains why so many people feel flat,
distracted, overstimulated, and disconnected from curiosity.
This campaign module explains a simple idea: many people are not broken at their core. They are overstimulated, digitally flooded, and mentally worn down. The curiosity engine may still be there, but constant algorithmic input can dull motivation and excitement.
Core message for voters
- Feeling numb or unmotivated is not always a character flaw
- Overstimulation can crowd out curiosity and focus
- Motivation often returns through recovery, movement, and healthier attention habits
- Brain health should be part of national health policy
Water fasting, focus, and practical discipline
My campaign also supports serious public education around discipline-based health habits, including focus routines, walking, strength training, better sleep, and carefully supervised fasting practices. For many Americans, structure restores energy.
I want voters to hear a real-world message: when you remove noise, reduce overload, and give your body a cleaner routine, your mind often becomes sharper and more focused.
My personal campaign testimony
In my own life, I experienced periods of stronger energy, sharper focus, and greater drive when I was disciplined about research, movement, and health routines. Before the chaos of the COVID-19 era and before later life disruptions, I had the energy to research deeply, invest in a home gym, and stay physically engaged in a way that supported both body and mind.
That experience matters to me politically because I know what it feels like when health supports momentum, and I know what it feels like when stress, trauma, disruption, and a broken culture drag people down. My campaign is about helping Americans get that edge back.
Campaign framing
My campaign believes America needs a stronger public conversation around motivation, digital overload, exercise, attention, curiosity, and practical mental resilience. Families, students, workers, caregivers, and veterans all deserve tools that help them rebuild energy and purpose in a world designed to hijack attention.
Healthy habits highlighted in this message
- Dopamine reset approaches to reduce overstimulation
- Physical exercise to restore drive and motivation
- Intentional curiosity instead of endless scrolling
- Reducing algorithmic overload and reclaiming attention
- Using routine and discipline to rebuild momentum
Motta 2028 position
I want a healthier, stronger America that protects human attention instead of letting every system exploit it. We should support better neuroscience education, better brain-health literacy, and practical tools that help people recover curiosity, discipline, and hope.
This page is educational campaign content and not medical advice. Fasting, major diet changes, or exercise changes should be approached responsibly, especially for people with medical conditions.
Nothing Excites Me Anymore: Brain Health, Motivation, and Recovery
Robert R. Motta • POTUS 48 Campaign Education Module
There is a growing public hunger for practical neuroscience that explains why so many people feel flat,
distracted, overstimulated, and disconnected from curiosity.
Drawing on the themes described in Olga Loiek's April 2026 video, this campaign module explains a simple idea: many people are not broken at their core. They are overstimulated, digitally flooded, and mentally worn down. The curiosity engine may still be there, but constant algorithmic input can dull motivation and excitement.
Core message for voters
- Feeling numb or unmotivated is not always a character flaw
- Overstimulation can crowd out curiosity and focus
- Motivation often returns through recovery, movement, and healthier attention habits
- Brain health should be part of national health policy
Campaign framing
My campaign believes America needs a stronger public conversation around motivation, digital overload, exercise, attention, curiosity, and practical mental resilience. Families, students, workers, caregivers, and veterans all deserve tools that help them rebuild energy and purpose in a world designed to hijack attention.
Healthy habits highlighted in the video themes
- Dopamine reset or "dopamine fast" approaches to reduce overstimulation
- Physical exercise to restore drive and motivation
- Intentional curiosity: going down meaningful rabbit holes instead of endless scrolling
- Reducing algorithmic overload and reclaiming attention
Motta 2028 position
I want a healthier, stronger America that protects human attention instead of letting every system exploit it. We should support better neuroscience education, better brain-health literacy, and practical tools that help people recover curiosity, discipline, and hope.
This page is educational campaign content and not medical advice. Persistent depression, numbness, or loss of motivation should be discussed with a qualified clinician.
Robert R. Motta
POTUS 48
Caregivers • AI • Neuroscience • Functional Medicine
Recruit the real world: the people I want at the table
My campaign is not built around résumé theater. It is built around lived experience, practical systems thinking, caregiving, and real-world results.
My first loyalty is to family caregivers. Caregiving time matters. Real life matters. What you learn helping family through illness, stress, disability, or decline is not “a gap.” It is leadership under pressure.
Why this matters to me
I bring a different kind of value. I have lived the caregiver reality. I understand that health policy is not abstract when you are managing appointments, stress, motivation, fatigue, food, medications, forms, logistics, and hope at the same time.
My 2010 ITIL certification mindset also matters here: good systems reduce waste, confusion, and burnout. In 2026, AI is a game changer, but only if it serves real people and not just paperwork or profit.
Motta 2028 message: We need a government that respects caregivers, listens to patients, uses technology wisely, and recruits people with real results instead of just institutional prestige.
Dr. Karin Huffer and trauma-informed reform
Dr. Karin Huffer became known for coining the term “Legal Abuse Syndrome” to describe trauma experienced by people caught in abusive or prolonged legal conflict. Her work is especially relevant to fraud, divorce, caregiver burnout, court-related trauma, and the way systems can grind down ordinary families.
My campaign would bring that trauma-informed lens into court reform, caregiver support, and administrative systems. Families do not just need legal procedure. They need systems that do not break them.
Neuroscience and motivation in the AI age
Creators such as Olga Loiek are helping a younger generation understand overstimulation, dopamine overload, motivation collapse, and how algorithmic environments can hijack curiosity. Her April 2026 video on why “nothing excites” people resonated because it frames burnout and overstimulation in accessible neuroscience language.
That matters to my campaign because America has a focus crisis. We do not just need more apps. We need healthier brains, better habits, and a culture that helps people recover curiosity, discipline, and purpose.
Examples of the kinds of experts and creators worth hearing
Ben Carson, MD
Retired neurosurgeon and former Johns Hopkins pediatric neurosurgery leader. A model of high-skill medicine and calm decision-making under pressure.
Institute for Functional Medicine
IFM trains clinicians in a root-cause, systems-oriented framework. Whether voters fully agree or not, this field has influenced how many Americans think about chronic illness and prevention.
Mark Hyman, MD
One of the most visible functional-medicine voices, focused on food, metabolism, and root-cause approaches to health.
Jason Fung, MD
Known for work on fasting, metabolism, and insulin resistance. His programs and educational content helped popularize fasting as a structured intervention.
Dave Asprey
Prominent biohacking communicator and founder of Bulletproof. He has helped mainstream the conversation around longevity, performance, sleep, and self-tracking.
Olga Loiek
A useful example of creator-led neuroscience communication for modern attention, curiosity, and motivation challenges.
My recruitment standard as President
- Real results over titles: I want people who improved lives, built systems, taught clearly, or delivered measurable outcomes.
- Caregiver competence counts: practical health management experience should be respected, not ignored.
- AI with guardrails: use AI for triage, navigation, education, and admin relief — not as a substitute for human judgment.
- Cross-disciplinary thinking: neuroscience, nutrition, functional medicine, trauma care, and systems design should talk to each other.
- No hormone hype: anti-aging medicine, testosterone, steroids, HGH, and peptide-style treatments should never be glamorized or self-prescribed. My campaign supports lawful, physician-supervised medicine and honest risk disclosure.
Policies I would push
- Caregiver recognition policy: federal forms, benefits systems, and care coordination should explicitly recognize unpaid family caregivers.
- AI care-navigation pilots: build privacy-respecting AI tools that help families find specialists, forms, benefits, and treatment questions faster.
- Trauma-informed systems: bring Dr. Huffer-style trauma awareness into legal, medical, and administrative settings.
- Functional and preventive health transparency: let patients compare conventional, lifestyle, and root-cause options more clearly, with stronger evidence labeling.
- Brain health and motivation education: support public education around sleep, exercise, digital overstimulation, addiction risk, and attention recovery.
Source list
- Equal Access Advocates: Dr. Karin Huffer
- Olga Loiek YouTube channel
- Dr. Ben Carson bio
- Institute for Functional Medicine: What is Functional Medicine?
- IFM practitioner search
- About Dr. Mark Hyman
- The Fasting Method (Dr. Jason Fung)
- IFM podcast with Dr. Jason Fung
- Dave Asprey official bio
This page is campaign content, not medical advice. Any treatment decision — especially involving fasting, hormones, steroids, HGH, peptides, or anti-aging protocols — should be made with a qualified clinician who knows the patient’s history and risks.
🇺🇸 Vote Motta 2028
America first. Voters first. Freedom first.
This campaign is about putting working families, honest elections, secure communities, and strong American leadership back at the center of public life. We are building a movement for citizens who want accountability, opportunity, and a government that serves the people — not the other way around.
Why this campaign matters
America needs leaders who respect the Constitution, defend free speech, protect lawful voting rights, and make sure every eligible voter can participate without confusion or delay. 🇺🇸
That means clear deadlines, transparent election rules, and a campaign that keeps voters informed months in advance, not at the last minute.
Voter registration first 🗳️
If you are a registered voter, your voice matters. If you are not registered yet, now is the time to get ready and stay informed.
This campaign will promote voter registration reminders, deadline alerts, and public updates so supporters always know what to do and when to do it.
Ballot access and filing rules ⚖️
Running for president is serious business. Ballot access has rules, deadlines, and paperwork that must be handled correctly and early.
We will treat filing, candidate registration, and election compliance as a priority — because voters deserve a campaign that is organized, prepared, and lawful.
Honest elections matter 🔒
Every American deserves confidence in the process. That means secure systems, transparent procedures, and proper oversight.
If the system is flawed, the answer is not silence — the answer is lawful action, public awareness, and stronger safeguards that protect the vote.
Public updates and outreach 📣
This campaign will use the website, email alerts, and public notices to keep people informed about:
-
Registration deadlines.
-
Filing updates.
-
Campaign events.
-
Voter education.
-
Volunteer opportunities.
The goal is simple: make it easy for Americans to stay informed and engaged.
America first message 🇺🇸
This is a campaign for people who believe in:
-
Secure borders.
-
Strong neighborhoods.
-
Free speech.
-
Honest government.
-
Prosperity for American workers.
-
A government that respects the people.
We are building a message that is bold, clear, and rooted in American values.
Final word
This is bigger than one campaign. It is about restoring trust, defending liberty, and giving patriotic Americans a voice.
Voters first. America first. Robert R. Motta for President. 🇺🇸🔥
Would you like me to turn this into a full homepage blog post with headlines, subheadings, and web-ready HTML formatting?
Transcript
Intro
[gentle music]
- Hi, "Vogue."
This is Jessica Alba.
I'm gonna put on bunny ears.
Well, I'm gonna show you how I do skin prep,
you know, before I'm doing my makeup.
And usually after a workout, I like to put this mask on.
Face Mask
It's a shea butter antioxidant mask
and it smells delicious.
I actually like to use this mask on the daily.
I'll just wake up, put this mask on,
and then I go downstairs and have my coffee
and hang out with my kids,
and I usually terrify my two-year old.
You basically wait for like 10 minutes.
I like to take it off with a sponge
'cause it's kind of a pain taking it off with anything else.
So I'll usually use the Deep Hydration Face Cream,
and do a squirt of that.
A Korean friend of mine told me to beat my face,
so I don't really like doing this,
but she said her mom looked really young
and she beats her face.
So this is like, a water-based cream.
So I go very liberally with this one.
I like to use this little device.
It basically just like, gets the blood flowing.
Face Massager
So that's that.
And then if you really wanna double-whammy it,
do this bad boy.
Face Roller
And this one you can even feel like,
warm up on your face and sometimes my face gets like,
a little bit red.
[Jessica babbling]
And then just wiping in the rest.
So, I usually put on an eye mask.
Eye Mask
I like these because they're like a bio-cellulose.
Yeah.
Yeah, and all of the skincare products that I use are clean.
And why I'm so passionate about it
is because I have such reactive skin.
And I've had such reactive skin literally since I was born.
I just really seek out products
that are, for the most part, fragrance-free
and then looking for products that don't have parabens,
don't have petroleum-based ingredients,
things like that, because I'm actually allergic
to a lot of petroleum-based ingredients.
I'm doing this lip scrub.
Lip Scrub
I find that when I'm tired and I have a lower immune system,
my skin rashes come out more
when I'm not sleeping.
And I've been shooting a TV show
and I have not been sleeping very well.
Champagne problems, right?
So I just scrub, scrub-a-dub.
So I think you should just put a balm on after,
like immediately after.
That is my skin prep.
I think it's important, whether you have kids or not,
as a woman in the world, trying to do the things,
get your hustle on, wearing all the hats.
I think it's important that we take time
to take care of ourselves,
and if you can do that on the daily,
even if it's for like, 10 minutes, it's important,
and don't let anyone take that away from you.
Hi, everyone.
I just wear these nice fluffy bunny ears
because it doesn't crease my hair.
I am going to do a diffused smokey eye.
I feel like this looks good on everybody.
It's a great day-to-night thing,
'cause you can just take your sort of like,
makeup-no-makeup look and if you add that eye,
you can transform your look to night,
and still have a nude lip so you can smooch.
I like to use two primers.
So this is the Glow primer
and I learned this from a makeup artist named Daniel Martin.
Basically I put the Matte primer
everywhere where I wanna be matte underneath,
and I put the Glow primer everywhere I want to glow.
So I want to be matte here, here,
sides of my nose, eyelid.
And you might be wondering
why I still have my eye mask on.
What's nice about having an eye mask on
while you're doing your makeup
is it can catch the fallout from your eyeshadow
when you're doing a smokey eye.
And then I put the Glow primer
everywhere where I wanna glow.
And some people just skip primers, but, cool.
Brow Brush
I'm just gonna brush my eyebrows up.
I've done microblading with my eyebrows.
Brows are a big thing and they frame your face.
I always kind of brush them before I start.
This is the nice neutral palette,
and what I like is it has
this really good bone color, or ivory.
And I first apply it with my finger,
Eye Shadow
and then get like, a fluffy brush.
I used to be really intimidated with doing my own eyeshadow
and then I learned that all you had to do
was have like, a really good fluffy brush
and you can buff out all your mistakes.
I'm gonna go in with this like, pretty unassuming,
it's just like a brown.
So I'm gonna put that all over the lid.
So the more, kind of, just buffed out
and diffused, the better.
So you don't have to worry about being so, so perfect.
There are these really pretty eye tints.
Like a blush-y.
So I'm gonna do that just along the line in here.
Eye Tint
And then there's this other one called 23.
So this one I'm doing right above the other one.
I'm just putting it along the lid,
but I do the lighter one closer to the lash line
and then the darker one above it.
So pretty.
[clicks tongue] This is when you're trying to be extra,
this palette is for you.
Basically all the colors are really beautiful,
but a little goes a long way.
Gold color, I'm gonna mix it
with this like, brown-ish color.
And I'm gonna do just the corner here
and then go underneath,
and create kind of like that wing, see?
And then I end it sort of halfway through.
And I'm gonna do the same on the other side.
It's always really stressful
to try and get both sides the same.
I'll start with the wing and just underneath.
I learned how to do my makeup from,
seriously, watching my mom,
'cause my mom couldn't wait to put on a full face.
I mean, even just to go to the grocery store.
I'm gonna use the Dior here.
I'm gonna go with this bronzy color.
This guy, very shimmery.
Shimmery, shimmery, shimmery.
And I'm gonna blend out on my lid over here.
And so now I'm gonna take off.
Now this, don't judge me,
just watch and learn.
Contour
I'm gonna do the contour.
So I like to use a darker foundation for contour,
and this is a cream foundation
but it's also can be used as a concealer, foundation.
And I just go in where I would normally do a contour.
And so the lighter color in the cream foundation
Foundation
I'm gonna put under my eyes.
And it doesn't really need to be blended out at all.
For some reason, my face stays longer when I do this.
Then I go in with the CCC,
it's like a SPF, like a tinted moisturizer.
It's like, makeup with skincare benefits.
And then I go in
and go to town.
Tinted Moisturizer
And you just go right over everywhere.
So when I was working as an actress full-time,
I had piles and piles of makeup
on my face all day long.
I was on lots of prescription medicine, actually, for acne.
And it's also because there really wasn't a makeup brand
that was clean that I could use on my skin.
And then when I became a mom and I stopped acting full-time,
and they say that your daughters
take your beauty away from you, well, they did.
So I cried a lot
and I became best friends with my esthetician,
'cause I basically saw her every other day.
I like these little concealer pens.
I'm gonna just put that underneath my eyes.
Concealer
And then get my powder.
I like this translucent powder,
and I get like, a fluffy brush.
Get off all the excess and I just like to powder
where I don't want that shine,
instead of doing the whole face.
So you still have that glow skin, ya know what I mean?
Bronzer.
That's me taking all the extra bits.
And just go around where I contoured before.
Bronzer
I always bring it down into the neck,
'cause there's nothing worse
than when it just stops right there, you know?
Get a fluffy brush, see how that's like a little weird,
and that one's good?
Buff it for the gods.
There we go.
Okay, so now I'm gonna press in this concealer.
So, eyebrows.
Even though I've gotten my eyebrows microbladed,
I still have little bits and bobs that need to be filled in.
I usually start from the outside,
and I like this one 'cause it has the brush on one side
and the pencil on the other.
Eyebrow Pencil
There we go.
Okay, so, there's this Marc Jacobs pencil.
So I'm gonna go into my lash line with that.
So I've already done the other shimmer
and I'm just gonna dot it,
Eyeliner
but the key is to just get it
as close to the lash line as possible.
And on the bottom I only take it halfway.
Okay.
Curling your lashes is everything.
I like to use this Tweezerman one.
It just really works well.
Eyelash Curler
And I always use a primer.
So what's cool about this one
is you have the primer on one side, mascara on the other,
and it works so well with people
with super-sensitive eyes, like me.
I always blink through the wand.
Eyelash Primer
Why not use some eyedrops?
I like to use these LUMIFY ones.
Eye drops
I'm gonna go in on the bottom lashes.
Blink through the wand.
Mascara
I remember watching my mom.
I'd always be like, "What is she doing?"
She'd be like.
Look at that pretty, fluffy brush.
Creme Blush.
And just put a little bit where you would naturally flush.
So you go like this.
Just right there on the apples of your cheeks.
Blush
So, long-wear lip.
I'm gonna do the lighter one on the outside,
Lipstick
and you can even go a little bit outside your lip line
if you wanna give the illusion of a fuller lip.
I like to smudge it like that.
Go in with a little bit darker nude
and just put it in the middle.
And maybe I'll put a little bit of powder
under my eyes.
Powder
Don't like to do a ton of powder but just a little.
The Magic Balm just here.
Lip Balm
So you still have the matte lip on the outside,
but on the inside you just have like, a little hint.
And there we go.
All done.
Bye.
Transcript
Welcome to Trial Tuesday and the truth will set you free.
11 seconds
[music]13 seconds
Now, please comment on this video, like this video, thumbs up. It's going to help the algorithms and spread this vital life-saving information. Let's get22 seconds
into this. Now, I love the quote from Albert Einstein. Genius abhores consensus because when consensus is30 seconds
reached, thinking stops. Stop nodding your head. Now, a few days ago, a judge did something that shook the world.39 seconds
Okay? And we're going to get into what he ruled, why he ruled it, and what you can do to protect yourself, your family.47 seconds
If you're a parent, a grandparent, a child, and you're living in America,51 seconds
this affects you. and I'm going to show you what you can do about the politics and how you can protect your family.59 seconds
So, what actually happened? Well, this judge, Judge Brian Murphy, blocked the Health and Human Services changes that1 minute, 7 seconds
he he says he made it uh without proper advisory committee on immunization practices process. He called the changes1 minute, 15 seconds
arbitrary and capricious. He restored the pre-January 2026 schedule and invalidated the rush ACIP appointments1 minute, 25 seconds
from June. Now, of course, the American Academy of Pediatrics um said it's a major victory for children's and1 minute, 32 seconds
communities and pediatricians everywhere. And the AAP filed lawsuits along with five other medical organizations.1 minute, 41 seconds
Now, it's interesting. I love this quote from Michael Kitton. The greatest challenge to mankind is the challenging of distinguishing reality from fantasy,1 minute, 51 seconds
truth from propaganda. Receiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind. But in the information age, or I think of it as disinformation age, it1 minute, 59 seconds
takes on a special urgency and importance. Michael Kiteon, really interesting guy. Okay. So, what actually happened? Well, um, before January 2026,2 minutes, 11 seconds
there were 18 universally recommended,2 minutes, 15 seconds
um, now, you know, they say they're not mandatory, but they are mandatory to get into most schools and to get jobs. After2 minutes, 24 seconds
January 2026, um, they reduced it down to 11. Now, these, uh, ones that were off of the schedule, they were moved to2 minutes, 32 seconds
discretionary. That means they weren't mandated and that you would have to decide whether you wanted to get them or not. So you actually had that personal2 minutes, 42 seconds
choice or could meet with a doctor. Now what the judge said and this is using political and SIDRAP.2 minutes, 50 seconds
How it was done was wrong. In June 2025 all the 17 advisory committee on immunization practices. The experts were2 minutes, 58 seconds
fired. 13 new handpicked members were appointed without proper vetting. In January 2026, a memo signed by a non-d3 minutes, 6 seconds
doctor acting as CDC director and no public comment and no uh comment and no scientific review. The court carb called it arbitrary and capriccious. Hm.3 minutes, 18 seconds
Interesting. Well, now what what's going on underneath this? If if the entire system was working so well, let's look3 minutes, 27 seconds
at the CDC. So ultimately this is to help the health of our population. Do we the healthiest population in America?3 minutes, 36 seconds
What's going on? Well, according to the CDC in the last 10 years from 2013 to 2023, 60% of our young people have a3 minutes, 44 seconds
chronic illness or disease. 80% of our population that's in the midlife has a chronic illness disease. And the older3 minutes, 53 seconds
adults, 90% have a chronic illness or disease. Um, that's that's not a good trend. And great quote from Michael4 minutes, 2 seconds
Kiteon. The greatest scientists in history are great because they broke with the consensus. There's no such thing as consensus science. If it is4 minutes, 11 seconds
consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period. And4 minutes, 19 seconds
um, scientific knowledge is a perpetual evolution. It finds itself changed from one day to the next. Remember, it's knowledge that we have up to that time.4 minutes, 30 seconds
Now, we're going to cover more in the second part, but that's only for members. So, you know, normally it costs4 minutes, 37 seconds
$30 a month to be on our adaptive physiology site. And this is where we have over 600 censored videos.4 minutes, 44 seconds
[laughter]4 minutes, 46 seconds
Now, we have a and here's the code word.4 minutes, 48 seconds
Write down big deal all capitals 01. And this way it's $4.50 a month. You get4 minutes, 57 seconds
access to all of our articles and you're going to see all sorts of content that we literally had to remove from social5 minutes, 4 seconds
media and and I'll see you there. And this oh you got to check out this article schedule battle that could change5 minutes, 12 seconds
everything. Brilliant article. Get on there. But no, the world was built for you and you were built for the world.5 minutes, 20 seconds
We've got to change the politics out of science and take care of yourselves. God bless you all.5 minutes, 35 seconds
[music]5 minutes, 43 seconds
Official public message
Building America’s future together
A stronger nation begins with strong families, strong communities, and strong ideas. This public message is about bringing people together around innovation, opportunity, education, and the American spirit that has always moved our country forward.
Message to the American people
America is strongest when its people are building, creating, learning, and moving forward together.
This public message is about restoring that spirit by supporting innovation, encouraging inventors, strengthening families, and making sure opportunity is within reach for every American, no matter their age or background.
We believe in an America where families feel secure, workers are respected, students are inspired, and innovation happens here at home. Our mission is simple: put American ideas, American workers, and American innovation first.
Approved by Robert R. Motta
America was built by inventors
Every person who improves a tool, solves a problem, or imagines something better is part of America’s innovation story. This message welcomes builders of every age and every background.
Experience matters
Service, labor, and hands-on knowledge often reveal the best practical ideas for the future.
The next generation starts now
Children and young adults should grow up believing they can invent something that makes life better.
Ideas in action
Turn ideas into action with IdeasToInvent.com
Great ideas deserve a place to grow. IdeasToInvent.com can serve as the action engine behind this message by connecting Americans with a place to share, build, and develop practical solutions.
Exploring beyond, inspiring what’s next
America’s leadership in space reflects the very best of who we are: bold, curious, hopeful, and determined to push forward. Space exploration belongs in this homepage as a symbol of discovery, progress, and inspiration for the next generation.
Image note
NASA imagery is included here in a factual, informational, family-friendly context. No endorsement is implied.
Learning, building, and growing as families
Innovation starts at home with curiosity, creativity, and the freedom to learn. Families should feel that science, invention, and opportunity belong to them too.
Learning that prepares children
Support learning that helps kids think, solve problems, and build real-world skills.
Innovation starts at home
Families can encourage children to ask questions, make things, and believe they can improve the world around them.
Hope for every generation
Children, parents, grandparents, and communities all deserve a future built on opportunity and progress.
Featured homepage sections
Featured inventor spotlight
Highlight one builder, one challenge, one solution, and one next step so the public can see innovation in a human way.
Problem-to-solution challenge
Invite people to think about how to fix everyday problems in transport, safety, learning, energy, and family life.
Family learning corner
Offer simple explainers for adults and children on patents, inventions, trade secrets, science, and public problem-solving.
Future of America briefings
Share clear, readable issue pages on innovation, resilience, invention policy, science, and public opportunity.
Closing statement
America’s future will be built by the American people
Our nation moves forward when people are free to learn, create, solve problems, and build something better. This public message is rooted in a simple belief: America First means believing in the strength, skill, and potential of the American people.
Together, we can build a stronger, smarter, more innovative future for families, workers, students, inventors, and communities across the country.
POTUS #48 Candidate
A Future Built
A Future Built
For Every American.
Robert R. Motta is running to restore the American dream, strengthen our military, and ensure dignity for our seniors and workers.
The Motta Mission:
Unity, Strength, Prosperity.
Our nation stands at a crossroads. We need leadership that understands the struggles of the heartland, the sacrifices of our service members, and the needs of our aging population.
Commander in Chief
A modern, lethal military focused on defense and readiness, honoring those who serve without political distraction.
Worker First Economy
Bringing manufacturing back to American soil and supporting the farmers who feed our nation.
Dignity in Aging
Protecting Social Security and expanding healthcare access for the generation that built this country.
48
Next POTUS
Policy Pillars
Real solutions for the challenges facing our families today. No empty promises, just a clear plan.
Military Readiness
Modernizing our forces and ensuring our veterans receive the world-class care they earned. Strength through readiness.
American Worker
Incentivizing domestic production and rebuilding infrastructure with American steel and American hands.
Healthcare Access
Lowering prescription drug costs and ensuring every senior can retire with dignity and access to care.
On The Ground
Robert R. Motta: Leading by listening to the American people.
Supporting Our Seniors
Dignity and care for our elders.
Honoring Sacrifice
Real support for our veterans.
With Our Troops
Strength and readiness.
The Backbone of America
Farmers, factory workers, and builders.
Prevention First
Real health reform for a healthier nation.
Full Disclosure
Transparency for the future.
Be Part of History.
Join thousands of Americans who are ready for a new chapter of leadership.
🇺🇸 Money, Power, and Broken Promises
Why I’m Running — Robert R. Motta
💰 What I See in American Politics
My name is Robert R. Motta, and after reviewing decades of U.S. presidents and politicians, I have come to a clear conclusion:
Our system is not just about elections.
It is about money, influence, and access.
Modern campaigns cost hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.
According to OpenSecrets:
-
The 2020 election cycle cost over $14 billion
-
Presidential campaigns often exceed $1 billion per candidate
-
Lobbying in Washington exceeds $4 billion annually
That kind of money does not come without expectations.
🔁 What I See — Before and After Elections
Across both parties, I see the same pattern.
Before Election:
-
Strong promises
-
Clear messaging
-
“I will fix the system”
After Election:
-
Slower action
-
Compromise with insiders
-
Policies shaped by influence and funding
This is not just opinion — it is a pattern voters recognize.
📊 What Presidents Have Promised — And What Happened
I have studied leaders from both parties.
Donald Trump
Promise: “Drain the swamp”
What I see:
The system remained filled with lobbyists and insiders, as widely reported by major outlets.
Barack Obama
Promise: Affordable healthcare
What I see:
Coverage expanded, but costs and complexity remained a major issue.
Joe Biden
Promise: Lower costs and economic relief
What I see:
Some programs passed, but many Americans still struggle with cost of living.
Ronald Reagan
Promise: Smaller government
What I see:
Government spending continued to grow over time.
George H. W. Bush
Promise: “No new taxes”
What I see:
Taxes were later increased due to budget realities.
George W. Bush
Barack Obama
Promise: Reduce or end wars
What I see:
Conflicts continued across administrations.
Bill Clinton
Donald Trump
Joe Biden
Promise: Help working Americans
What I see:
Results have been mixed, and many still feel left behind.
📉 What the Data Shows
According to Pew Research Center:
-
Many Americans believe government is influenced by powerful interests
-
Trust in government has remained low for decades
According to Congressional Budget Office:
-
Federal spending has consistently increased over time, regardless of party
🇺🇸 My Conclusion
After reviewing history, I believe this:
-
Campaigns require large funding to win
-
Funding often comes from major donors and organizations
-
After election, those relationships influence access and decisions
This creates a system where:
Promises meet reality — and often fall short.
🔥 Why I Am Different
I am not funded by large donor networks.
I am not part of that system.
“Most candidates are funded before they are elected.
That funding comes with expectations.
I am running without that system.”
🧠 What I Believe
This is not about one party.
It is about a structure that:
-
Requires money to compete
-
Creates influence after elections
-
Leaves voters feeling unheard
🇺🇸 My Commitment
I am running to represent:
-
Citizens over donors
-
Transparency over influence
-
Accountability over promises
🔚 Final Thought
“The problem is not just broken promises.
It is a system that makes it hard to keep them.”
🇺🇸 PART 2 — Congress, Promises, and Reality
What I See After Reviewing Congress — Robert R. Motta
After reviewing presidents, I looked at Congress.
What I found is the same pattern:
Promises before election — reality after.
And behind it all:
Money.
💰 The Cost of Getting Elected
According to OpenSecrets and federal data:
-
2022 midterms cost $8.9 billion total
-
Average winning House campaign: ~$2.8 million
-
Competitive Senate races: $100M+
Sources:
📊 PROMISES vs REALITY — CONGRESS
1. Nancy Pelosi
Campaign Promise:
Protect working families, regulate big money
Funding Reality:
-
$46+ million raised (2020 cycle, including leadership PACs)
What I see:
Leadership is tied to fundraising power
Sources:
2. Mitch McConnell
Campaign Promise:
Fiscal responsibility, limit government
Funding Reality:
-
Senate Leadership Fund: $290+ million spent (2020)
What I see:
Fiscal messaging exists alongside massive political spending
Sources:
3. Chuck Schumer
Campaign Promise:
Support middle class, reduce inequality
Funding Reality:
-
Senate Majority PAC: $260+ million (2022)
What I see:
Policy messaging tied to large donor networks
Sources:
4. Kevin McCarthy
Campaign Promise:
Government accountability, reduce waste
Funding Reality:
-
Congressional Leadership Fund: $260+ million (2022)
What I see:
Accountability messaging within a high-cost system
Sources:
5. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Campaign Promise:
Fight big money, represent grassroots
Funding Reality:
-
$9.6 million raised (2022)
What I see:
Even grassroots campaigns require millions
Sources:
6. Ted Cruz
Campaign Promise:
Defend Constitution, limit federal power
Funding Reality:
-
$46+ million raised (2018 Senate race)
What I see:
Limited-government messaging still requires large funding
Sources:
7. Elizabeth Warren
Campaign Promise:
End corruption, regulate Wall Street
Funding Reality:
-
$93 million raised (2020 presidential campaign)
What I see:
Anti–big money campaigns still operate within high-cost system
Sources:
8. Marco Rubio
Campaign Promise:
Support working Americans, economic growth
Funding Reality:
-
$50+ million raised (2022 Senate race)
What I see:
High funding required to remain competitive
Sources:
9. Bernie Sanders
Campaign Promise:
Fight billionaires, reduce money influence
Funding Reality:
-
$200+ million raised (2020 presidential campaign)
What I see:
Even small-donor movements operate at massive scale
Sources:
10. Ilhan Omar
Campaign Promise:
Represent underserved communities
Funding Reality:
-
$4.5+ million raised (2022)
What I see:
Even local races require millions
Sources:
📉 What Government & Research Data Shows
According to Pew Research Center:
-
Americans believe government is influenced by powerful interests
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/
According to Gallup:
-
Congress is one of the least trusted institutions
https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx
According to the Federal Election Commission:
-
Campaign finance data confirms millions raised per candidate
https://www.fec.gov/data/
🇺🇸 My Conclusion
After reviewing Congress and the data:
-
Campaigns require millions to win
-
Funding comes from donors, PACs, and networks
-
After election, access and influence follow funding
Promises meet pressure — and often fall short.
🔥 Why I Am Different
I am not funded by major donors.
I am not backed by political machines.
“Most politicians must raise millions to stay in power.
I am running without that system.”
🧠 Final Thought
“After reviewing presidents and Congress, the pattern is clear:
Big promises.
Big money.
And a system that rarely changes.”
🇺🇸 MOTTA 2028 — OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN PAGE
✅ Constitutional Qualifications to Serve as President
Under the United States Constitution:
-
Natural-born U.S. citizen
-
At least 35 years old
-
14 years U.S. residency
No law degree required. No military service required.
I meet every requirement.
🇺🇸 Why I Am Running
I am not a career politician.
I am not part of the system.
I am someone who has experienced it firsthand.
“I didn’t study the system. I survived it.”
I retained attorney Michael A. Lew for a $2,000 business dispute in Will County, Illinois.
It was not a second divorce.
According to my records, that business matter became entangled in the same courthouse system handling my divorce-related proceedings.
What followed, in my experience:
-
Legal abuse
-
Financial harm
-
Disputed child-support debt
-
Extreme income garnishment
-
Damage to my name and livelihood
-
Time spent in custody tied to civil enforcement
This was not justice.
This was systemic abuse with no accountability and no harm prevented.
I spent countless hours in court instead of building my life.
That should never happen in America.
⚖️ LAWFARE — WHAT IT REALLY IS
This is what many Americans now call:
LAWFARE
The use of the legal system itself as a weapon —
not to deliver justice, but to:
-
Exhaust
-
Control
-
Financially destroy
⚖️ LAWFARE IS NOW A NATIONAL ISSUE
Donald Trump
President Trump has repeatedly described lawfare on Truth Social as:
-
“Weaponization of the justice system”
-
“Radical left judges”
-
“Activist judges interfering with democracy”
He argues courts are being used politically, not neutrally.
Dr. Phil McGraw
Dr. Phil has warned about activist judges, saying:
-
Courts are stepping beyond their role
-
Judicial decisions are shaping political outcomes
-
Public trust in justice is declining
🇺🇸 My Position
This is not just happening at the top.
This is happening to everyday Americans.
“If lawfare can reach a president, imagine what it does to ordinary citizens with no platform.”
⚖️ COST TO TAXPAYERS
Lawfare is not just harmful — it is expensive.
Taxpayers fund:
-
Massive federal investigations
-
Years of court proceedings
-
Government legal teams
-
Detention, enforcement, and appeals
Reality:
-
January 6 became one of the largest DOJ investigations in history
-
Billions are spent annually across federal and state legal systems
-
Single cases can cost millions
Meanwhile:
-
Families are financially destroyed
-
Citizens are trapped in court
-
No measurable “no harm” standard exists
Taxpayers fund the system — and then suffer under it.
⚖️ GOVERNMENT POWER — NO HARM STANDARD
Federal law allows up to 65% of disposable income to be garnished for child support.
That means the system can legally take most of what you earn.
But:
-
Where is the protection?
-
Where is the no harm standard?
-
Where is accountability when errors happen?
⚖️ DOCUMENTED OVERSIGHT FAILURES
Joseph C. Polito
A Will County judge was officially disciplined and suspended without pay by the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board.
That is not opinion.
That is public record.
Yet the system tells citizens:
“Trust us.”
🇺🇸 TRANSPARENCY & LAWFARE
Tom Fitton
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch has used FOIA lawsuits to force the release of government records.
Their work shows:
-
Government agencies resist transparency
-
Records must be forced into the open
-
Accountability often requires lawsuits
This is lawfare in reverse:
Citizens forced to sue their own government just to get the truth.
🇺🇸 THE BIGGER TRUTH
Across America:
-
Political leaders claim lawfare
-
Citizens experience lawfare
-
Families are damaged by lawfare
Meanwhile:
-
Taxpayers fund both sides
-
Courts expand in cost and power
-
Accountability remains limited
This is not left vs. right.
This is lawfare vs. the American people.
🧱 My Plan as President
1. Family Court Transparency Act
-
Public case tracking
-
Recorded proceedings
-
Full fee disclosure
2. Legal Abuse Accountability Board
-
National complaint tracking
-
Public reporting
-
Enforced timelines
3. Child Support Justice Reform
-
Automatic audits
-
Protection against wrongful enforcement
-
Limits on excessive garnishment
4. Billing Transparency Law
-
Itemized billing
-
Real-time disclosure
-
Fraud penalties
5. Wrongful Incarceration Review
-
Independent review
-
Compensation where proven
6. Mediation First Policy
-
Incentivize resolution
-
Reduce litigation abuse
-
Protect families
👨👩👦 Family & Values
I did not serve in the military.
But my father did — a Purple Heart veteran.
I was raised to believe in:
-
Justice
-
Accountability
-
Responsibility
🔥 Why I Am Different
The political class:
-
Has degrees
-
Has power
-
Has donors
And still — Americans suffer.
“They had power. They did nothing.”
I am unknown because I never played their game.
🇺🇸 My Promise
I will fight for:
-
Transparency
-
Accountability
-
Equal justice
“No abuse. No lawfare. No harm ignored.”
📚 Learn More
-
Research Dr. Karin Huffer
-
Watch Divorce Corp
-
Follow Judicial Watch FOIA investigations
⚠️ Final Message
This campaign is about millions of Americans who feel:
-
abused by the system
-
targeted by lawfare
-
ignored by institutions
-
forced to pay for their own harm
If you have ever felt that —
This campaign is for you.
⚖️ Legal Abuse Syndrome — A Documented Reality
Dr. Karin Huffer
Dr. Karin Huffer was a licensed therapist, author, and expert witness who identified what she called Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS) — a condition describing the psychological, emotional, and financial harm caused by prolonged involvement in adversarial legal systems.
Her work is based on decades of clinical experience with individuals involved in:
-
Family and divorce court cases
-
Workplace and whistleblower disputes
-
Government and legal conflicts
According to Dr. Huffer’s research, people subjected to prolonged legal conflict may experience:
-
Anxiety and chronic stress
-
PTSD-like symptoms
-
Financial devastation
-
Damage to family stability
-
Loss of trust in institutions
She argued that in some cases, the legal system itself can escalate conflict rather than resolve it, especially when cases become prolonged, adversarial, and financially driven.
Dr. Huffer also advocated for:
-
Trauma-informed legal processes
-
Greater accountability in courts and legal systems
-
Mediation and resolution-focused alternatives
🌐 Learn More (Official Resources)
-
Main information page:
https://equalaccessadvocates.com/dr-karin-huffer -
Book: Overcoming the Devastation of Legal Abuse Syndrome
-
Additional materials and advocacy resources are available through her published work and associated organizations.
🇺🇸 Why This Matters
Millions of Americans enter the legal system expecting fairness.
Too many experience:
-
Financial loss
-
Emotional harm
-
Years of time taken from their lives
Legal Abuse Syndrome provides a framework to understand why.
A system designed to deliver justice can, in some cases, cause harm when safeguards and accountability are missing.
RESTORING LOYALTY TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE — NOT SPECIAL INTERESTS
I am running for President of the United States in 2028 on a simple principle:
my loyalty is to the American people—no one else.
Across both political parties, voters are seeing the same pattern. Major candidates rely on large donor networks, PACs, and outside spending groups to fund their campaigns. Public data compiled by Track AIPAC shows that many 2028 contenders from both parties are associated with significant funding tied to organized lobbying networks, while others have limited or no disclosed federal data depending on their position.
This is not about one party. It is not about one issue.
It is about a system where money, influence, and access often come before transparency and accountability.
WHAT I STAND FOR
I do not accept special-interest PAC money.
I do not rely on billionaire donor networks.
I am not controlled by any lobby—foreign or domestic.
And I will never be influenced, pressured, or compromised by hidden relationships, financial leverage, or blackmail.
The American people deserve a President who is:
-
Financially independent
-
Politically accountable
-
Transparent in decision-making
CORE POLICIES AMERICANS AGREE ON
My campaign focuses on issues that research and polling consistently show broad bipartisan support for:
1. Full Government Transparency
-
Accelerate declassification of historical records
-
Require agencies to explain redactions and delays
-
Public access to major-case documents
📊 Source: National Archives ongoing record releases (JFK and other federal files)
2. Accountability Without Exceptions
-
Independent reviews when government failures occur
-
Stronger oversight of federal agencies
-
Consequences for misconduct regardless of position
📊 Source: U.S. Inspector General and Congressional oversight reports
3. Honest Communication
-
Government must clearly state what is known, unknown, and under investigation
-
No more false certainty on major national issues
📊 Source: U.S. intelligence community assessments acknowledging uncertainty (e.g., COVID-19 origins)
4. Protecting Whistleblowers
-
Expand protections for those exposing wrongdoing
-
Strengthen enforcement of existing laws
📊 Source: Congressional Research Service on whistleblower protections
5. Ending Overclassification
-
Reduce unnecessary secrecy
-
Set deadlines for automatic declassification
📊 Source: Bipartisan national security and classification reform studies
WHY THIS MATTERS
When candidates depend on powerful funding networks, voters begin to question:
-
Who are they really accountable to?
-
What influences their decisions?
-
What information is being withheld—and why?
That loss of trust is one of the biggest threats to our democracy today.
MY COMMITMENT
I am not asking for blind trust.
I am offering something stronger:
A government that shows its work.
A campaign that answers to voters—not donors.
And leadership that cannot be bought, influenced, or compromised.
FOR VOTERS AND PRESS
I encourage everyone—voters, journalists, and researchers—to review publicly available funding data, compare candidates across both parties, and ask the same question I am asking:
Who is truly independent—and who is not?
Source for campaign finance discussion:
Track AIPAC – “2028 Presidential Candidates”
Public statement for voters and anyone following politics
I want voters, independents, and anyone paying attention to politics to look carefully at where the money is coming from. The 2028 candidate tracker published by Track AIPAC lists major Democratic and Republican figures alongside what it describes as Israel-lobby-related totals, including PAC money, independent expenditures, and lobby-linked donors. On that page, some federal candidates are listed with large totals, while several governors are marked “No federal data available.” (Track AIPAC)
My point is not that every candidate is the same in every respect. My point is that the public deserves to know who is funded by which interests, how those networks operate, and whether those relationships shape public policy. That is a legitimate question in any democracy. (Track AIPAC)
If you are a voter, I encourage you to review the records for yourself, compare candidates across both parties, and ask who is truly accountable to the American people first. Transparency should not be partisan. It should be the minimum standard for anyone seeking high office. (Track AIPAC)
Source: Track AIPAC, “2028 Presidential Candidates.” (Track AIPAC)
Press-facing version
I am calling attention to publicly available campaign-finance tracking that voters and journalists can review directly. Track AIPAC’s 2028 candidate page lists a range of potential presidential contenders from both parties and assigns what it describes as Israel-lobby-related totals based on PACs, independent expenditures, and lobby-linked donors. The same page notes that some gubernatorial figures have no federal data available. (Track AIPAC)
My argument is straightforward: political funding relationships deserve scrutiny, disclosure, and fair reporting, regardless of party. I am encouraging reporters, researchers, and voters to examine the underlying records, compare candidates consistently, and ask whether special-interest funding is influencing the direction of national politics. (Track AIPAC)
This is not a call for speculation. It is a call for transparency, documentation, and equal standards. When large financial networks are involved in national politics, the public has a right to know. (Track AIPAC)
Primary source: Track AIPAC, “2028 Presidential Candidates.” (Track AIPAC)
END THE COVER-UPS: TRUTH, TRANSPARENCY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
For too long, the American people have been asked to accept incomplete answers, delayed disclosures, and “official conclusions” that leave more questions than clarity. Across multiple administrations—Republican and Democrat alike—there has been a pattern: information is withheld, investigations lack transparency, and the public is told to move on.
I am not running to defend a system like that. I am running to change it.
The truth is, many of the most discussed events in our country—whether recent or decades old—are not controversial because of wild theories. They are controversial because the government has failed to fully show its work. Records are released years late. Key details remain redacted. Agencies contradict each other. And when uncertainty exists, it is often hidden instead of acknowledged.
Americans deserve better than that.
What You May Not Be Hearing Enough About
Jeffrey Epstein Case
Serious failures in custody, surveillance, and transparency continue to raise questions. The Department of Justice reaffirmed suicide as the cause of death, while also acknowledging procedural breakdowns and ongoing public skepticism.
👉
Charlie Kirk Case (2025)
In the ongoing prosecution, a federal ATF analysis found the bullet evidence was inconclusive in matching the alleged weapon. Additional forensic testing is underway, and multiple forms of evidence are still being evaluated in court.
👉
JFK Assassination Records
More records were released in 2025 and 2026, continuing a decades-long process of disclosure. Public opinion still shows a majority of Americans believe more than one person was involved, even as historians continue to debate the evidence.
👉
RFK & MLK Assassinations
Newly released files and longstanding investigations show evidence of broader conspiracies being considered, though official conclusions remain debated and incomplete in the eyes of many Americans.
👉
COVID-19 Origins
U.S. intelligence agencies have stated that a lab origin is considered more likely than natural origin—but with low confidence—highlighting how uncertainty was not always clearly communicated early on.
👉
The Real Issue: A Pattern of Hidden Information
This is not about one case. It is about a pattern:
-
Delayed document releases
-
Overclassification and excessive redactions
-
Lack of accountability when procedures fail
-
Public messaging that hides uncertainty instead of explaining it
That pattern is what breaks trust.
What I Will Do As President
I will not promise you secret answers. I will promise you something stronger: a government that shows you the evidence.
1. Presumption of Transparency
Federal agencies will be required to justify why information is hidden—not why it should be released.
2. National Disclosure Portal
A single public platform where Americans can access records, timelines, and explanations across major cases—without relying on leaks or speculation.
3. Truth in Uncertainty
Agencies must clearly state what is known, what is unknown, and what is still under investigation—no more false certainty.
4. Whistleblower Protection Expansion
Protect those inside government who expose wrongdoing, concealment, or mishandling of evidence.
5. Independent Accountability Reviews
Automatic investigations into major failures in evidence handling, record preservation, and interagency coordination.
6. Declassification Reform with Congress
End indefinite secrecy by updating laws that allow information to remain hidden long after any legitimate need.
A Realistic Commitment to Truth
Not everything can be released immediately. National security, ongoing investigations, and victim privacy matter.
But secrecy must be the exception—not the default.
And when information is withheld, the American people deserve to know exactly why.
Restoring Trust Through Proof
This campaign is not about feeding speculation.
It is about ending the conditions that create it.
The American people are strong enough to handle the truth.
What they have not been given is consistent access to it.
That ends with me.
Statement to the American People
Robert R. Motta for President of the United States, 2028
I am Robert R. Motta, and I am running for President of the United States in 2028 because I believe the American people deserve leadership that actually listens to what they are going through every day.
When I look at the data, and more importantly when I listen to people, the message is clear. Americans are not asking for complicated theories. They are asking for basic things to work again.
They are worried about the cost of living. Prices are too high, wages are not keeping up, and families are stretched thin. That is not a talking point. That is reality.
They are worried about the economy and jobs. People want stable work, fair pay, and the ability to build a future without feeling like the system is stacked against them.
They are worried about healthcare. Costs are too high, access is uneven, and too many families are one bill away from financial stress. I believe healthcare should serve patients, not corporations.
They are frustrated with government itself. Many Americans feel like leadership is disconnected, unaccountable, and more focused on politics than results. I hear that frustration, and I take it seriously.
They are concerned about immigration and border management. Americans want a system that is lawful, orderly, secure, and humane, not chaos and not political theater.
They care about public safety. Communities want to feel safe, supported, and stable.
They are struggling with housing. Rent, home prices, and availability are putting pressure on families, especially younger Americans trying to get started.
They care about the direction of the country, about fairness, opportunity, and whether the system works equally for everyone.
And when it comes to national leadership, they want a Commander in Chief who is steady, responsible, and focused on protecting American lives and interests.
What I Hear from Veterans
I also want to speak directly about our veterans.
Our veterans served this country. They should not have to fight the system when they come home.
What I hear from veterans is clear:
- They want faster access to healthcare.
- They want better mental health support.
- They want the VA to work efficiently.
- They want real support for toxic exposure cases.
- They want accountability, not bureaucracy.
That is not too much to ask. That is the minimum we owe them.
My Top Priorities for America
- Lower the cost of living.
- Strengthen the economy and job opportunities.
- Make healthcare more affordable and transparent.
- Restore trust and accountability in government.
- Secure and manage the border responsibly.
- Improve public safety.
- Address housing affordability.
- Support veterans with real services and care.
- Ensure fairness in the justice system.
- Lead responsibly in foreign policy.
- Expand opportunity through education and skilled trades.
- Invest in infrastructure and American industry.
- Support families and caregivers.
- Reduce the influence of money and special interests.
- Restore trust between government and the people.
What I Will Do as President
I will focus on affordability and work to lower costs where government policy can make a real difference.
I will push for real healthcare transparency and stronger patient protections.
I will support American workers, small businesses, and domestic industry.
I will prioritize veterans by fighting for better healthcare, housing, and support systems that actually work.
I will demand accountability from government agencies, not excuses.
I will work to reduce the influence of special interests and bring decision-making back to the people.
I will be honest about what a President can do alone and what requires Congress, because the American people deserve truth, not empty promises.
My Message to Voters
This campaign is not about left versus right.
It is about whether the government works for the people again.
I believe it can.
And as President, I will work every day to make sure it does.
Statement to the American People
Lawfare, Judicial Restraint, and Accountability
I am Robert R. Motta, and I believe in the rule of law, not rule by abuse. I am against lawfare from the left, the right, judges, lawyers, agencies, and political operatives. If the law is used as a weapon instead of a safeguard, the public loses trust and the Constitution loses meaning.
What This Debate Is About
America needs real judges, real prosecutors, real investigators, and real accountability. Judges should decide cases based on law and jurisdiction, not ideology. Presidents should be reviewed lawfully, not paralyzed by politicized process. Agencies should enforce the law, not act like political actors.
“These are not people you elected. You elected President Trump.”
“Judges need to be judges. They need to let politicians be politicians.”
That gets to the heart of the public concern. Americans want constitutional balance. They do not want courts legislating from the bench, and they do not want any branch of government weaponized against the people.
My Position on Lawfare
- I oppose activist judging.
- I oppose politically stretched prosecutions.
- I oppose agency abuse and selective enforcement.
- I oppose venue shopping and process abuse.
- I oppose the use of public office as a political weapon.
- I support equal treatment under law for everyone.
My Standard
My standard is the same for everyone: jurisdiction matters, due process matters, facts matter, and the Constitution matters.
I do not support presidents being blocked by improper nationwide injunctions from courts with weak ties to the dispute. I also do not support any president, party, or agency abusing power and then calling accountability “lawfare.” The rule of law must mean the same thing for everyone.
What I Will Do as President
- Push for stricter venue standards in politically sensitive cases.
- Support reforms to reduce abuse of nationwide injunctions.
- Demand transparency in major politically sensitive investigations.
- Hold federal employees accountable if they misuse public office.
- Defend constitutional checks and balances without allowing weaponized process.
- Restore public trust through fairness, consistency, and equal enforcement.
My Message to Voters
This is not about protecting one politician or attacking another. It is about whether the law serves justice or serves power.
As President, I will not tolerate abuse by judges, lawyers, agencies, or federal employees who think they answer to politics instead of the Constitution.
America needs zero tolerance for lawfare.
Statement to Voters
The System, The People, and Taking Back America
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe Americans are waking up to something many have felt for years: the system is not working for them.
George Carlin Said It Clearly
“They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.”
“It’s a big club… and you ain’t in it.”
George Carlin wasn’t talking about left vs right. He was talking about power. About how decisions are made, who benefits, and who gets left behind.
Healthcare Is One Example
The United States spends more than almost any country in the world on healthcare, yet millions struggle with costs, access, and outcomes.
“We’re spending far more, and getting less.”
The Political Reality
Both parties have made promises on healthcare and accountability. But many Americans still feel left behind.
On Accountability
Americans deserve transparency in investigations involving powerful individuals. The system must apply equally to everyone.
The Bigger Issue: The “Club”
- Billionaire donors influencing elections
- Corporate lobbying shaping laws
- Media narratives influencing perception
- Policies that do not reflect voter priorities
My Position
- I am not part of a billionaire donor system.
- I support transparency and accountability.
- I support policies that put American families first.
- I support reducing money influence in politics.
What I Will Do as President
- Push for transparency in government decisions
- Reduce corporate and donor influence
- Improve healthcare accountability
- Prioritize veterans and working families
Message to Voters
This campaign is not about left vs right. It is about whether government works for the people.
As President, I will stand with the American people — not the “club.”
Learn more:
www.votemotta2028.com
www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Healthcare Reform, Patient Rights, and Accountability in America
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe healthcare in America must serve patients, families, caregivers, veterans, and workers before corporations, monopolies, and political systems that protect profit over people.
Americans have heard promises for generations. What we need now is follow-through, transparency, affordability, and a system designed around care instead of billing.
What Jimmy Dore’s Criticism Gets Right
Jimmy Dore has been relentless in criticizing politicians who campaign on healthcare reform but fail to fight for it when leverage exists. His core argument is simple: voters are tired of promises that turn into excuses.
Voters are tired of promises without follow-through.
I agree with that basic point. Healthcare should not be a slogan. If leaders promise reform, they should be willing to use real political power to pursue it.
What This China Comparison Shows
In another Jimmy Dore segment, he highlights a striking comparison between American and Chinese healthcare costs. The video contrasts a reported one-day U.S. hospital visit costing tens of thousands of dollars with a same-day hospital visit in China costing just a few dollars.
“We’re spending 15 times more money per person on healthcare in the United States than China does.”
Whether or not every anecdote is identical in every case, the broader point is undeniable: America spends vastly more than other countries and still leaves people facing delays, surprise bills, employer dependence, and barriers to specialists and treatment.
The video also makes a larger argument that our system is burdened by high provider costs, administrative waste, pharmaceutical pricing, and the use of health insurance as a form of control over workers and families.
The Presidential Record: Successes and Failures
The modern history of federal healthcare shows both real progress and major unfinished work.
- Harry Truman pushed national health insurance but failed to get it passed.
- Lyndon Johnson created Medicare and Medicaid.
- Richard Nixon expanded the HMO model that shaped managed-care systems.
- Bill Clinton failed to pass broad healthcare reform.
- Barack Obama passed the Affordable Care Act but kept a fragmented private-insurance structure.
- Later presidents left Americans with a system that still costs too much and delivers too unevenly.
Vaccines, Drugs, and Liability
My position is simple: no company should be above accountability when a product is unsafe and people are harmed. Americans deserve informed consent, honest safety reporting, and a fair path to justice when injuries occur.
Existing federal law created special liability frameworks in some vaccine and emergency countermeasure cases. A President cannot erase those laws alone, but a President can lead the fight to change them.
My Healthcare Position
- Patients come before pharmaceutical profits.
- Healthcare reform must focus on affordability, transparency, and accountability.
- I support preventive care, nutrition, and functional medicine alongside evidence-based care.
- I support stronger patient rights when drugs or vaccines cause harm.
- I support reducing corporate capture of regulators and healthcare policy.
- I support reform that breaks the grip of employer control and billing abuse.
What I Can Do as President
The American people deserve honesty about presidential power. A President cannot rewrite every healthcare law alone. Congress controls major statutes and appropriations. But a President can still do a great deal.
- Propose major healthcare legislation and make it a top national priority.
- Push Congress to reform liability rules and strengthen injury-compensation systems.
- Direct agencies to expand price transparency and expose hidden healthcare costs.
- Appoint leaders who support patient-centered reform rather than industry capture.
- Expand support for prevention, nutrition, chronic-disease reduction, and integrative-care research.
- Use the presidency to pressure lawmakers publicly instead of hiding behind excuses.
My Promise to Voters
I will not promise what a President cannot legally do. But I will promise this: I will fight for patients, not corporations. I will push for accountability, not immunity from responsibility. I will support healthcare reform that respects families, caregivers, veterans, and the right of every American to honest information and fair treatment.
America has lived with partial fixes and broken promises for too long. My campaign is about follow-through.
Source Credit
Background based on Jimmy Dore’s Medicare for All pressure politics, his China-cost comparison video, official international health-spending data, the modern presidential healthcare record, and federal vaccine liability and compensation frameworks.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Protecting America’s National Parks, Public Access, and Public Trust
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe America’s national parks are one of our greatest national treasures. They belong to the American people. They should be beautiful, protected, accessible, safe, and honestly managed.
Our parks are more than tourist destinations. They are part of our national identity, our history, our wildlife, our public lands, and our inheritance to future generations.
The Importance of National Parks
America’s park system reaches across all 50 states and beyond. It includes iconic landscapes, battlefields, monuments, cultural sites, coastlines, mountains, deserts, forests, and historic places.
- Great Smoky Mountains
- Zion
- Yellowstone
- Grand Canyon
- Yosemite
- Rocky Mountain
- Acadia
- Grand Teton
- Olympic
- Glacier
These are some of the most visited national parks in the country, but every park matters, from the largest landscapes to the smallest historic sites.
Why This Matters to My Campaign
Public lands should be open to the public in reality, not just on paper. Visitors should know where they can safely go, what restrictions exist, what conditions they face, and what resources are available when something goes wrong.
That is why reporting and public conversations about inconsistent warnings, unclear access, weak signage, trail neglect, or unexplained communication problems matter. Even when individual claims are unverified, they point to a real issue: public trust.
The Transcript as One Example
The transcript describes traveler concerns and observations in parks such as Grand Canyon, Rocky Mountain areas, Yosemite, Great Smoky Mountains, Olympic, and Death Valley. It focuses on a pattern of vague warnings, unexplained discouragement, changing rescue language, unsupported trails, and visitors feeling that some places are treated differently without clear explanation.
“These places are not hidden. They are not restricted by law.”
“Access remains open, at least on paper.”
Whether every claim in that video is right or wrong, the bigger lesson is valid: the American people deserve clear communication, honest signage, maintained trails, transparent safety protocols, and equal public access to public lands.
My Position
- I support America’s national parks and public lands.
- I support safe, clear, and fair public access.
- I support stronger maintenance, signage, and rescue readiness.
- I support inclusion so every American feels these lands belong to them too.
- I support transparency when areas face restrictions, hazards, or operational limits.
- I support conservation without turning parks into neglected or confusing spaces.
What I Will Do as President
- Fight to protect and properly fund the National Park Service.
- Push for improved trail maintenance, maps, signage, and emergency communication systems.
- Require clearer public notice when access is limited in practice, not just in theory.
- Support infrastructure upgrades in roads, campgrounds, visitor centers, and rescue capacity.
- Strengthen accessibility so more families, veterans, seniors, and children can enjoy public lands.
- Promote conservation, recreation, tourism, and local economic growth together.
- Preserve these lands for future generations instead of allowing slow neglect.
What a President Can Actually Do
A President cannot manage every trail personally, and Congress controls appropriations. But a President can propose larger park budgets, direct agencies to improve transparency and maintenance priorities, appoint leadership that values stewardship and public access, and work with Congress to strengthen the National Park Service and public-land infrastructure.
Message to Voters
America’s national parks should inspire trust, pride, and freedom — not confusion, neglect, or silence.
My campaign stands for protecting public lands, preserving natural beauty, improving access, supporting park workers and local gateway communities, and making sure the American people can enjoy these places safely and confidently.
As President, I will treat our parks as national treasures worthy of real stewardship, real investment, and real respect.
Source Credit
Background based on official National Park Service system and visitation data, plus the transcripted video discussing visitor concerns about communication and access in several major parks.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Rebuilding America’s Infrastructure – Jobs, Safety, and the Future
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe America is facing a national infrastructure crisis that both parties have talked about—but failed to fix.
What the Transcript Shows
The report makes it clear: America is falling behind because of decades of neglect, underinvestment, and lack of leadership.
“We are living off the investments and the hard work of our parents and our grandparents.”
:contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
The transcript shows:
- One-third of major U.S. roads are in poor or mediocre condition
- One in nine bridges is structurally deficient
- Airports are outdated and operating beyond capacity
- Flight delays cost the economy billions every year
- Freight systems are bottlenecked, especially in Chicago
- Flood systems and levees are aging and underfunded
In one example, California flood systems protecting hundreds of thousands of people are over 100 years old and underfunded by a factor of four. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
“Once we were the model for the world. Now we’re falling well behind.”
:contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
The Real Problem
This is not a lack of knowledge. This is a failure of leadership and priorities. The transcript explains that America invests less than 2% of GDP in infrastructure, while other countries invest far more.
Meanwhile, projects are delayed by politics, fragmentation, and competing interests. As one expert says, we lack national leadership to bring everything together. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
What This Means for Americans
- Longer commutes and wasted time
- Higher costs for goods and services
- Unsafe bridges and failing roads
- Flight delays and poor travel experience
- Lost jobs and reduced economic competitiveness
Infrastructure is not just concrete and steel—it is jobs, safety, and the backbone of the American economy.
My Plan
- Fix what we have first—roads, bridges, water systems, and transit
- Prioritize maintenance over political “new project” announcements
- Modernize airports and air traffic systems
- Invest in rail and freight efficiency to reduce bottlenecks
- Upgrade flood protection and climate resilience systems
- Support public-private partnerships with accountability
- Streamline permitting without cutting safety standards
What I Will Do as President
- Propose a major national infrastructure plan on Day 1
- Unify federal agencies under one coordinated infrastructure strategy
- Push Congress to increase investment to globally competitive levels
- Hold states and cities accountable for project delays and cost overruns
- Prioritize American workers, materials, and manufacturing
- Create jobs across construction, engineering, and logistics sectors
As President, I will treat infrastructure as a national priority—because it is directly tied to economic growth, national security, and quality of life.
Message to Voters
America built the greatest infrastructure system in the world once. We can do it again.
This is not a partisan issue. Both sides agree it needs to be done. What has been missing is leadership and execution.
My campaign is about rebuilding America—not just talking about it.
Learn more about my campaign:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Hearing Directly from Veterans
What Veterans Are Saying About Homelessness, Agent Orange, and VA Failure
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe Americans need to hear directly from veterans themselves. Not filtered through talking points. Not buried in reports. Not softened by politics. Veterans know what service cost them, and many know what happened after the uniform came off.
This transcript is one example of a larger national pattern. A Vietnam veteran describes war, toxic exposure, homelessness, a broken support system, and the feeling that after serving his country, he was left behind.
What This Veteran Says
He describes combat in raw, personal terms and says he would not wish war on his worst enemy. He talks about being on the street, lacking identification, trying to survive, and considering pharmaceutical testing just to get off the street quickly because he saw no faster option.
“They never got me.”
He says a VA-linked housing situation failed him, that he was pushed out, and that he did not get the help he needed when he was vulnerable. He also says the public needs to see what is happening to veterans in America right now.
“Five of my buddies dead from Agent Orange.”
He connects his own health problems to Agent Orange, says he now has it in his lymph nodes, and describes losing faith after learning about carcinogenic properties while the spraying continued.
“They’re abandoning their people.”
That sentence should stop every American in their tracks. Because this is not just one man talking about one bad day. This is a veteran saying the institutions with the most resources are still failing the people who served.
What Voters Should Hear in This
- Veterans are still dealing with the long-term effects of toxic exposure decades after war.
- Some veterans fall through cracks in housing, identification, benefits, and treatment systems.
- Homeless veterans often face overlapping problems: trauma, illness, aging, and bureaucratic failure.
- The country owes more than speeches and thank-yous to people who served.
My Position
I support veterans being heard in their own words. I support full recognition of toxic exposure. I support housing first, treatment first, and real accountability when the VA or related systems fail. And I support a government that treats homeless veterans as a national emergency, not a background issue.
My Veterans Policies
- Immediate housing pathways for homeless veterans, not endless delay.
- Faster claims and treatment for Agent Orange, burn pit, and classified-site toxic exposure cases.
- Better coordination between the VA, housing programs, and local service providers.
- Emergency ID recovery and benefits access for veterans stuck outside the system.
- Expanded mental health, addiction treatment, and long-term care support.
- Oversight and accountability for failed discharge, shelter, and referral decisions.
As Commander in Chief
As Commander in Chief, I would make one principle clear: if America can send men and women into war, America can take care of them when they come home. That means hospitals, housing, toxic exposure care, family support, and a system that works before veterans hit the street.
My administration would push for urgent reforms so veterans are not forced into survival decisions that no one who served this country should ever have to make.
Message to Voters
Veterans do not need more slogans. They need a government that listens, acts, and takes responsibility. When a veteran says the system failed him, America should pay attention.
My campaign will always stand for veterans, for truth, and for the principle that service to this country must be honored with real care, real housing, and real justice.
Source Credit
Based on a transcripted interview with Vietnam veteran Stephen Remy discussing war, homelessness, Agent Orange, VA failures, and what happens to veterans after service. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Ending Zombie Cities, Restoring Downtowns, and Getting Americans — Especially Veterans — Off the Streets
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe no American city should be allowed to decay into a hollowed-out downtown with vacant buildings, shuttered storefronts, rising disorder, and human suffering on the streets.
I also believe no veteran who served this country should end up homeless, untreated, forgotten, or left outside while Washington wastes money and argues about priorities.
What I Mean by “Zombie Cities”
“Zombie city” is not an official federal category. It is a plain-English way to describe downtown areas that have been emptied out by high office vacancy, weak foot traffic, closed businesses, public disorder, addiction, untreated mental illness, and visible homelessness.
Across America, downtown distress shows up differently, but the pattern is familiar: vacant office space, weak retail activity, fewer residents, less safety, and more people living in crisis on the street.
Examples Voters Should Know
- Chicago downtown office vacancy has been reported above 26%.
- Seattle office vacancy has been reported above 25%.
- San Francisco office vacancy has been reported above 24%.
- Austin and Dallas have both been reported above 20%.
- Across distressed downtowns, outdated “zombie” buildings are often more than half vacant.
This is not only a real-estate problem. It is a family problem, a public-safety problem, a housing problem, a business problem, a mental-health problem, and a national morale problem.
The National Homelessness Emergency
America is facing record homelessness. Hundreds of thousands of people are in shelters, transitional housing, vehicles, encampments, or on sidewalks on any given night.
- National homelessness has reached record highs.
- Unsheltered homelessness remains a major crisis.
- Big cities carry much of the visible burden, but suburbs and rural communities are affected too.
- Veteran homelessness remains a serious national failure even after recent improvements.
Homeless Veterans
Homelessness among veterans has fallen from prior years, which proves progress is possible. But thousands of veterans are still homeless, and too many are unsheltered. That is unacceptable.
Some states continue to carry especially heavy burdens, and in several states most homeless veterans are living unsheltered rather than in stable programs. That means many are outside, exposed, and vulnerable.
A nation that can fund endless waste can fund housing, treatment, and dignity for veterans.
My Position
- I am against letting American downtowns die.
- I am against abandoning people with addiction, trauma, or serious mental illness to the streets.
- I am against treating homeless veterans like a statistic instead of a national obligation.
- I support housing, treatment, public order, and real accountability together.
- I support restoring downtowns so families, workers, businesses, and residents can return safely.
My Solutions
- Convert viable vacant office buildings into housing where projects make financial and structural sense.
- Use surplus federal property for shelters, transitional housing, treatment, and supportive housing.
- Expand veteran-focused housing through HUD-VASH and Supportive Services for Veteran Families.
- Push more emergency rental assistance and housing vouchers to high-need communities.
- Fund serious mental-health and addiction treatment instead of endless street churn.
- Require measurable local performance from cities receiving federal homelessness funds.
- Prioritize street outreach, rapid rehousing, and supportive housing over bureaucracy.
- Support local law enforcement and service coordination so public spaces are safe and humane.
What I Can Do as President
A President cannot fix every city alone, and Congress controls appropriations. But a President can do a lot.
- Propose larger budgets for veteran housing, treatment, and supportive services.
- Direct HUD, VA, HHS, GSA, and DOJ to coordinate downtown recovery and homelessness response.
- Expand use of HUD-VASH and veteran rapid-rehousing tools.
- Prioritize surplus federal property for homelessness and veteran-support uses under existing law.
- Push for faster approvals for housing conversions and treatment-centered projects.
- Condition federal grants on real outcomes, not endless process.
- Make homeless veterans a first-order national priority on day one.
My Veterans First Plan
- No veteran left on the street without an active housing pathway.
- Faster placement into permanent housing with case management.
- Better coordination between VA hospitals, shelters, and local providers.
- Expanded mental-health, addiction, and trauma care for homeless veterans.
- More support for veteran families at risk of eviction before homelessness begins.
Message to Voters
America does not need more excuses. We need downtowns that work, streets that are safe, treatment that is available, housing that is real, and a government that remembers veterans before it remembers politics.
My campaign stands for restoring American cities, protecting neighborhoods, helping people in crisis, and making sure no veteran is left homeless in the country they served.
Source Credit
Background based on HUD’s 2024 homelessness report, official HUD and VA veteran-housing program materials, and current office-vacancy reporting from national real-estate research sources.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
No More “Zombie Cities” – Real Solutions for Homelessness and Veterans
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe America is facing a visible, undeniable crisis in many of our cities—homelessness, addiction, and collapsing urban conditions. But this is not just a city problem. It is a national failure of policy, priorities, and leadership.
Real-World Example: Philadelphia
A recent documentary highlights what is happening in parts of Philadelphia, especially Kensington. The transcript describes a situation where thousands of people are living without stable shelter, many unsheltered, and struggling with addiction, illness, and extreme instability.
“This is not staged. This is not rare. This is not just homelessness…
people are slowly disappearing in plain sight.” :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
The report states that over 5,500 people were experiencing homelessness in Philadelphia, with more than 1,100 living unsheltered, and rising year over year. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
It also describes areas where addiction has taken over entire blocks, with people barely able to function—what some call “zombie-like” conditions—not to dehumanize them, but to show the severity of addiction and life on the street. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
This is one example—but similar conditions are being reported in cities across America.
This Is Not Just One City
What we are seeing in Philadelphia is part of a broader national crisis:
- Rising homelessness across major U.S. cities
- Increasing unsheltered populations
- Addiction crises tied to fentanyl and synthetic drugs
- Shortage of affordable housing
- Breakdown of mental health systems
- Growing number of homeless veterans
These are not isolated problems. They are connected failures.
My Position
- No American city should collapse into disorder and human suffering.
- No veteran should be homeless in the country they served.
- Addiction and mental health must be treated—not ignored.
- Housing must be part of the solution—not just temporary shelters.
- Government must act with urgency, not bureaucracy.
My Solutions
- Expand permanent supportive housing (proven to reduce long-term homelessness).
- Convert vacant buildings into housing where feasible.
- Increase federal coordination between housing, health, and veteran services.
- Fund addiction treatment and recovery programs at scale.
- Strengthen outreach teams to connect people to services immediately.
- Address root causes: housing costs, job loss, and healthcare access.
Veterans First
Homeless veterans are a national responsibility. If you served this country, this country must not leave you on the street.
- Expand veteran housing programs immediately
- Guarantee placement pathways for homeless veterans
- Increase mental health and addiction treatment access
- Support families of veterans at risk of homelessness
What I Will Do as President
- Make homelessness and veteran housing a national emergency priority
- Direct federal agencies to coordinate real solutions—not fragmented programs
- Push Congress for increased funding tied to measurable results
- Use existing federal authority to accelerate housing and treatment programs
- Demand accountability from cities receiving federal funds
As Commander in Chief, my responsibility is not just defense abroad—it is stability at home. That includes making sure American cities are livable, safe, and functioning.
Message to Voters
What you are seeing in places like Philadelphia is not normal—and it should not be accepted.
We can fix this. We know what works. What has been missing is leadership, priorities, and the will to act.
My campaign is about restoring order, compassion, and real solutions—so no American is left on the street, and no city is left to collapse.
Learn more about my campaign:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Health Freedom, Functional Medicine, Caregiving, and Veterans First
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe health care in America must serve patients, families, caregivers, and veterans before corporations, bureaucracy, and pharmaceutical lobbying.
I have seen health care from the family side. I have spent time caregiving in the Motta family and helping the people I love. My family includes my Aunt June Motta, my Uncle Jake Motta, my father Raymond E. Motta, a Purple Heart war veteran, and my Uncle Louis Motta, an Air Force veteran. That experience shaped my view: health policy is not abstract. It is about the people you care for when they are sick, aging, injured, or fighting to get help.
What the Transcript Shows
In the Fox Business segment, Hogan Gidley argued that today’s health-care problems were caused by Democratic policy and said Trump and Republicans were trying to lower costs. The segment also quoted Trump saying he wanted subsidy money to go directly to people so they could buy their own insurance and that drug discounts would help reduce costs.
“I want the money to go directly to the people.”
My campaign takes a broader view. Americans are not only dealing with insurance premiums and prescription prices. They are dealing with chronic disease, poor nutrition, caregiver burnout, weak preventive care, VA access problems, toxic exposure, and a system too often captured by large corporate interests.
My Health Position
- I am against Big Pharma control over public health policy.
- I support price transparency, patient choice, and real competition.
- I support stronger nutrition policy and prevention, not just more prescriptions.
- I support functional and integrative medicine alongside evidence-based conventional care.
- I support doctors being free to practice patient-centered medicine without corporate interference.
- I support stronger accountability when drugs or vaccines cause preventable harm.
Functional Medicine and Nutrition
I support functional medicine because chronic disease in America is driven by more than one cause. Nutrition, inflammation, metabolic disease, environment, stress, sleep, and preventive care all matter.
Dr. Mark Hyman has appeared before both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House to discuss chronic disease, nutrition, and functional medicine. That tells voters this approach has reached serious policy forums, not just podcasts or private clinics.
I also support other doctors working in nutrition, preventive care, metabolic health, and functional medicine, as long as they are transparent with patients and grounded in real clinical accountability.
Vaccines, Drug Safety, and Liability
My position is simple: no manufacturer, agency, or corporation should be above accountability when a product is unsafe. I support reviewing federal liability protections and compensation systems so patients are not left powerless when they suffer serious harm.
That does not mean rejecting every vaccine or every medicine. It means demanding honest safety review, informed consent, transparent reporting, and a fair path to justice when people are injured.
Veterans First Health Care
As Commander in Chief, I will put veterans first in health policy. The federal government already spends enormous sums through the Department of Veterans Affairs, but too many veterans still face delays, poor access, aging facilities, fragmented records, and inadequate family support.
A President cannot legally spend any amount he wants without Congress. But on day one, a President can propose a larger VA budget, direct the VA Secretary to prioritize urgent reforms, accelerate already appropriated modernization projects, and push Congress for emergency toxic-exposure and caregiver packages.
My Day One Veterans Health Policies
- Direct a full review of VA hospital wait times, staffing shortages, and facility conditions.
- Push to expand and speed up hospital modernization and repair projects.
- Prioritize toxic-exposure care, including Area 51-related cases and classified-site veterans.
- Expand access for spouses, caregivers, and dependent families affected by service-related illness.
- Strengthen caregiver support, including mental health help, respite care, and coverage pathways.
- Improve medical record interoperability so veterans do not get lost between systems.
- Establish a rapid-response pathway for veterans with cancer, rare disease, and severe toxic exposure claims.
Area 51 Veterans and Their Families
I support care not only for Area 51 veterans, but for their wives, children, and families if service-related toxic exposure has had long-term health consequences. These families should not be trapped between secrecy, data-masking, and denial while illnesses continue.
My administration would push for recognition, records review, specialized clinical pathways, and benefits reform so these families can get answers and treatment instead of bureaucratic delay.
How I Would Improve VA Hospitals
The honest answer to voters is this: I cannot wave a wand and invent unlimited money. But I can fight for larger appropriations, demand smarter use of enacted funds, speed repairs, and make veterans hospital reform a first-order national priority. If Washington can find money for foreign priorities and waste, it can find money to fix hospitals for the men and women who served this country.
Message to Voters
My campaign stands for a health system that serves people before corporations. That means nutrition, prevention, caregiver support, veterans first, functional medicine options, drug-safety accountability, and a federal government that works for patients instead of lobbyists.
I know what caregiving looks like. I know what veterans mean to American families. And I know that if we want a healthier nation, we must build a system based on care, truth, and accountability.
Source Credit
Based on the Fox Business transcript discussing Trump, healthcare costs, and ACA policy.
Additional background drawn from White House health-policy materials, official VA budget documents, VA caregiver and family-benefit resources, and official Senate and House records for Dr. Mark Hyman’s testimony.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Pro-Farmer, Pro-Family, Pro-Rural America
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I stand with American farmers, ranchers, dairy producers, grain growers, and small family farms. Farmers are not just part of our economy. They are part of our identity, our food supply, and our future.
This issue is personal to me. My Aunt June and Uncle Jake had a farm in southern Illinois. I remember the good times, the hard work, and the generosity. They would bring steaks and even whole cows to my house. That was real America: family, farming, food, and community. We cannot let that way of life disappear.
What the News Shows
The transcript paints a clear picture of the pressure farmers are under. Farmers are already dealing with higher feed and fertilizer costs, climate pressures, animal disease, workforce shortages, trade retaliation, and uncertainty from federal policy changes.
- U.S. farms declined by 7% from 2017 to 2022, a loss of about 142,000 farms.
- About two-thirds of crop workers are foreign-born.
- USDA estimated 42% of crop laborers were undocumented.
- China imposed an additional 15% import tax on some American farm products and 10% on others.
- The United States exported nearly $13 billion in soybeans to China in the prior year.
The report also showed how cuts to food-aid programs ripple back into rural America by reducing demand for products grown and processed in U.S. farming communities. When Washington disrupts these systems, it does not only affect one company or one crop. It hits entire local economies.
What This Means for Farmers
Farmers do not get five or six chances a year to correct policy mistakes. Most get one planting season, one harvest, and one chance to make the numbers work. When labor dries up, export markets are hit by retaliation, or food-aid contracts are frozen, small and local farms can be pushed to the edge.
Farmers need more federal support, not more uncertainty.
Small farmers, family farmers, dairy operations, grain co-ops, and rural towns all depend on stable policy, fair trade conditions, and workable labor systems. If farmers fail, Main Street fails with them.
My Position
- I am pro-farmer.
- I support stronger federal support for small and local farms.
- I support policies that protect rural economies, not just major corporate interests.
- I support stable labor solutions so crops do not rot in fields and farms do not go under.
- I support fair trade that does not leave farmers carrying the cost of geopolitical fights.
- I support restoring demand channels that help farmers move crops, feed people, and keep communities alive.
My Policies for Farmers
- Expand direct support and emergency relief for small and family farms.
- Protect local farmers from being wiped out by tariff retaliation and policy whiplash.
- Improve legal agricultural workforce pathways so farms have dependable labor.
- Strengthen support for co-ops, rural processors, and local supply chains.
- Prioritize rural infrastructure, water systems, roads, and broadband.
- Increase support for beginning farmers and help keep multigenerational farms alive.
- Defend American food security by investing in domestic agriculture first.
What I Will Do as President
If elected President, I will fight for farmers as a national priority. I will not treat rural America like an afterthought. I will work to reduce the damage caused by sudden federal decisions, make sure family farms have a fair shot, and put the needs of producers, workers, and rural communities back at the center of national policy.
My administration will stand for food security, stable farm income, strong rural communities, and a future where the next generation can still afford to farm in America.
Message to Voters
Supporting farmers means supporting American families. It means supporting local communities, independent businesses, truckers, equipment dealers, grain elevators, feed suppliers, and the future of our country.
I know what farming families mean to America, and I know what they have meant in my own life. That is why my campaign will always stand with farmers.
Source Credit
Based on CBS Evening News coverage of how tariffs, immigration policy, and foreign-aid cuts affect U.S. farmers, dairy operations, rural employers, food-aid supply chains, and agricultural export markets. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Transparency, Federal Accountability, and the Right to the Truth
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people have a right to transparency, accountability, and confidence that the federal government will tell the truth in high-profile cases.
The transcript I reviewed raises questions about the death of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody, focusing on autopsy details, facility procedures, missed checks, camera failures, and whether the official explanation resolved the public’s concerns. My campaign position is simple: when a case involves federal custody, public trust, and unanswered questions, the government must meet a higher standard of transparency.
What the Transcript Highlights
The transcript walks through the timeline leading up to Epstein’s death, including his earlier incident in custody, placement on watch protocol, removal from that protocol, the absence of a replacement cellmate, alleged missed 30-minute checks for about eight hours, and the malfunction or unavailability of the camera angle nearest his cell. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
It also discusses disputed medical and mechanical details, including neck fractures, the appearance of the neck markings in photographs, timing questions, and the handling of the body after discovery. The speaker’s conclusion is not that every theory is proven, but that the overall situation does not feel resolved and that “the details matter.” :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
“The details matter.” :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
“It does not feel clean.” :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
What Voters Should Take From This
This is not just about one inmate or one case. This is about whether Americans can trust the federal system when someone dies in custody under extraordinary circumstances.
- Federal detention facilities must follow strict safety and monitoring procedures.
- If procedures fail, the public deserves a full explanation.
- If evidence is missing, corrupted, or unavailable, confidence in the system breaks down.
- When officials say a case is settled, the facts must support that conclusion.
- Americans have a right to ask questions without being dismissed.
My Position
I support full lawful transparency in high-profile federal custody cases. I support document review, procedural accountability, and independent scrutiny where serious public doubts remain. I do not believe the public should be asked to blindly accept official conclusions when the timeline, records, and evidence leave major questions unanswered.
My campaign is about restoring trust in government. That means a system where powerful people do not get special treatment, where custody failures are investigated honestly, and where Americans are not expected to ignore obvious inconsistencies.
What I Will Do as President
- Require full procedural review when a high-profile inmate dies in federal custody.
- Strengthen detention oversight, including monitoring, record retention, and camera accountability.
- Support independent review mechanisms in cases where public trust has broken down.
- Enforce preservation of evidence and clear chain-of-custody standards.
- Increase transparency around federal facility failures while protecting lawful privacy limits.
- Demand accountability from officials responsible for negligence, concealment, or procedural collapse.
Message to Voters
Americans should not have to choose between blind trust and wild speculation. A serious government provides facts, preserves evidence, answers hard questions, and earns public confidence.
If elected President, I will fight for a government that respects the public’s right to the truth and a justice system that does not hide behind confusion, delay, or missing evidence.
Source Credit
Based on the transcript of “Jeffrey Epstein: The Autopsy Details No One Is Talking About,” which reviews timeline issues, autopsy observations, procedural concerns, and unresolved questions from a mortuary-science perspective. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Truth, Evidence, and Accountability in America
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people deserve truth grounded in evidence—not confusion, not recycled narratives, and not selective transparency.
Fact Check: The “Doctor Bombshell” Claim
Recent media cycles have revived claims that Jeffrey Epstein did not die by suicide, citing forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden. It is important for voters to understand:
- Dr. Michael Baden made these claims originally in 2019—not new evidence.
- His argument focuses primarily on fractures in the hyoid bone and neck area.
- He suggested these findings were “more consistent with strangulation.” :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
“The evidence points toward homicide rather than suicide.” — Dr. Michael Baden :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
What the Research Says
The same segment explains that peer-reviewed medical research contradicts the claim that such fractures only occur in homicide cases.
- Studies show hyoid bone fractures occur in approximately 25% of known hanging suicides.
- This means the presence of fractures alone does NOT prove homicide.
- Other claims about guards, cameras, and timelines are not medical findings.
In other words, the medical argument alone is not definitive—and the broader case includes both forensic questions and procedural failures that still concern the public.
What This Means for Voters
Americans are caught between two extremes:
- Blindly accepting official narratives
- Or accepting every alternative claim without evidence
Neither is acceptable. The American people deserve a government that presents clear, verified facts and allows legitimate questions to be investigated properly.
My Position
- All claims must be evaluated based on evidence—not headlines.
- Medical findings must be separated from speculation.
- Procedural failures in federal custody must be fully investigated.
- Public trust requires transparency and consistency.
- No case involving powerful individuals should be closed without scrutiny.
What I Will Do as President
- Ensure independent review of high-profile federal custody cases.
- Strengthen standards for evidence transparency and reporting.
- Separate political influence from Department of Justice decisions.
- Require clear public communication of findings backed by science.
- Restore trust by allowing legitimate oversight and accountability.
As Commander in Chief, I will not allow confusion, recycled narratives, or incomplete explanations to define justice in America. The truth must be based on facts, evidence, and accountability—not headlines or speculation.
Message to Voters
This election is about restoring trust in the system. That means rejecting both blind acceptance and blind speculation—and demanding real answers grounded in evidence.
America deserves leadership that respects the truth, follows the science, and ensures accountability at every level.
Learn more about my campaign:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Accountability, Justice, and the Rule of Law
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people deserve a justice system that is transparent, accountable, and equal for everyone— especially when it involves powerful individuals and institutions.
What the Transcript Shows
In a recent House Oversight situation, former Attorney General Pam Bondi was subpoenaed to testify regarding the Epstein files but declined to appear. Members of Congress raised the possibility of contempt charges.
“She’s looking for excuses.” — Rep. Summer Lee :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
According to the transcript, there is clear precedent for former officials—including attorneys general—to testify before Congress when they were involved in relevant matters. The refusal to testify raises serious questions about accountability and transparency.
The discussion also highlighted concerns that contempt referrals may not be enforced if they are sent to the Department of Justice, particularly when conflicts of interest or political influence are involved. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
What This Means for Voters
This is bigger than one person. This is about whether the justice system works the same for everyone—or whether powerful individuals can avoid accountability.
Americans are asking a simple question: If a regular citizen ignores a subpoena, what happens? Now compare that to what happens when someone in power refuses.
My Position
- No one is above the law—past or present officials included.
- Subpoenas must be enforced, or the rule of law breaks down.
- Congressional oversight must be respected by all branches of government.
- Survivors deserve full transparency and real accountability.
- The justice system must not be influenced by politics or personal connections.
Department of Justice – The Problem
The transcript raises a major concern: when contempt referrals go to the Department of Justice, will they be enforced? If the DOJ fails to act, then oversight becomes meaningless.
This is where trust breaks down. Americans lose faith when investigations appear selective, delayed, or influenced by political connections.
What I Will Do as President
- Ensure the Department of Justice operates independently and enforces the law equally.
- Require full compliance with congressional subpoenas, regardless of position or status.
- Support transparency in major investigations involving public officials.
- Strengthen protections for whistleblowers and witnesses.
- Prioritize justice for victims over political protection.
As Commander in Chief and President, I will not allow a system where power protects itself. The American people deserve truth, accountability, and a government that enforces the law— not one that avoids it.
Message to Voters
This election is about restoring trust. It is about whether we continue with a system where accountability is optional for the powerful—or whether we rebuild a system where the law applies to everyone equally.
Learn more about my campaign:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Justice for Survivors, Accountability for the Powerful
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people deserve a government that puts survivors first, protects the vulnerable, and holds powerful people accountable no matter their title, wealth, or social standing.
The CNN discussion about reactions to Melania Trump’s statement on Jeffrey Epstein raised an important issue: survivors have already carried a terrible burden, and justice cannot depend only on asking more from those who were harmed.
What the Segment Showed
Attorney Gloria Allred said she supports hearings where survivors can testify if they want to, but that they should not be forced or subpoenaed. She argued that it should be their choice, their voice, and their day. She also said that if public figures want to clear their names, they should be willing to testify under oath themselves. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
“I would be very very happy to testify.” — Alicia Arden :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
“Asking more of them now is a deflection of responsibility, not justice.” — statement from a group of survivors :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
That is the core truth voters should understand. Survivors have already shown courage by coming forward. Real justice means institutions doing their job, not shifting all responsibility back onto the people who were abused.
My Position
I support justice for survivors. I support voluntary testimony if survivors choose it. I support sworn testimony and full accountability for everyone with relevant knowledge. And I support a system where survivors are treated with dignity, not used as political cover.
No survivor should be pressured into public testimony. No survivor should be retraumatized because government officials failed to act sooner. And no person with real power should get to hide while others are asked to carry the burden for them.
What Voters Should Know
- Survivors deserve control over whether they testify publicly.
- Congressional hearings should protect survivors, not exploit them.
- Public officials who claim knowledge or innocence should testify under oath themselves.
- The justice system must protect survivor identities and avoid further harm.
- Accountability cannot stop with one or two names if others enabled abuse or concealment.
What I Will Do as President
If elected President, I will push for a government that treats survivor protection and anti-trafficking enforcement as real national priorities, not talking points.
- Support survivor-centered hearings and investigative procedures.
- Strengthen protections for victim privacy and identity in federal case handling.
- Demand accountability from any official who mishandles evidence, files, or victim protections.
- Increase anti-trafficking enforcement with a focus on networks, enablers, and cover-ups.
- Ensure that justice does not depend on wealth, celebrity, or political influence.
My position is simple: survivors should be respected, protected, and heard if they choose. The burden of justice belongs to the government, the courts, and the people in power who failed to stop these crimes.
Source Credit
Based on CNN coverage of reactions by Gloria Allred, Alicia Arden, and a group of Epstein survivors to Melania Trump’s statement regarding hearings and survivor testimony. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
America First, Families First, Farmers First
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the White House must serve the American people first. My loyalty is to American families, American workers, American farmers, our veterans, our children, and future generations.
I reject a foreign policy where billions flow overseas while Americans struggle with food prices, housing costs, medical bills, failing infrastructure, and uncertainty about the future. That is not America First. That is not voter first. That is not family first.
What I Took From This Discussion
In the TYT segment, Ana Kasparian argued that foreign influence and big donor politics have distorted American priorities. Her core point was simple and powerful: “Trump has a price.”
The segment also highlighted a Hanukkah reception moment in which Mark Levin referred to Trump as “our first Jewish president,” and Trump responded, “Yeah. That’s true.” The broader argument in the discussion was that this reflected an unhealthy political culture where loyalty to outside interests is celebrated while American needs are pushed aside.
The same segment described Trump joking about donor money with a reference to “another 250,” reinforcing the larger criticism that massive donor influence shapes policy in ways ordinary Americans cannot match.
What Voters Should Understand
The issue is not religion. The issue is not ordinary Americans of any background. The issue is corruption, donor power, and policy priorities. When politicians answer to billionaires and lobbying pressure before they answer to voters, families pay the price.
Americans should ask basic questions: Why are we always told there is no money for our own people, but there is always money for more foreign military aid? Why do farmers get squeezed, veterans fight for care, and working families fall behind while Washington keeps writing checks?
The Money Question
- Israel has received more than $300 billion in cumulative U.S. aid in inflation-adjusted terms.
- The current U.S. memorandum of understanding provides $3.8 billion per year through 2028.
- Since October 7, 2023, the United States has enacted at least $16.3 billion in direct military aid to Israel.
Meanwhile, American families face rising living costs, rural communities need investment, infrastructure needs repair, and our own people deserve stronger support at home.
My Policy Position
- No foreign government comes before the American people.
- No billion-dollar donors will buy my loyalty.
- No blank checks for foreign wars while U.S. priorities are neglected.
- Support for farmers, food security, and rural America will be a real priority.
- Veterans, families, and future generations come before donor politics.
- Foreign policy decisions must reflect U.S. national interest, not outside pressure.
What I Will Do as Commander in Chief
If elected President, I will put American interests first in every national security decision. I will not let donor money, foreign pressure, or Washington groupthink determine whether Americans are asked to carry the burden of war.
- Protect U.S. troops from unnecessary foreign entanglements.
- Require clear national-interest justification before military escalation.
- Audit foreign aid and military assistance for waste, dependency, and mission creep.
- Shift attention back to domestic priorities, including farmers, veterans, infrastructure, and family affordability.
- Restore a government that answers to citizens, not billionaires.
My loyalty is not to donors. My loyalty is not to lobbyists. My loyalty is to the American family, the American voter, the American child, and the future of this country.
Sources
Commentary and quoted phrases adapted from The Young Turks segment on Trump, Mark Levin, and Miriam Adelson.
Aid figures based on the Council on Foreign Relations explainer, “U.S. Aid to Israel in Four Charts,” updated October 7, 2025.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement to Voters
Foreign Policy, War Decisions, and America First Leadership
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people deserve honest leadership when it comes to war, foreign influence, and the lives of our service members.
In a recent discussion by The Young Turks, commentators including Ana Kasparian and Cenk Uygur analyzed how U.S. leadership decisions may have been influenced in the lead-up to conflict with Iran. Their discussion raises serious concerns about how foreign policy decisions are made and who they serve.
What Was Said
“Please take that disgusting war criminal off the screen. He makes me want to puke.”
— Ana Kasparian :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
The discussion also described a Situation Room meeting in which Israeli leadership presented a plan portraying war as low-risk and easily achievable. According to the transcript, intelligence officials later described parts of that plan as unrealistic or “BS.” :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
The broader claim made in the discussion is that the United States may have been drawn into a dangerous conflict based on overly optimistic or misleading assumptions, putting American lives and resources at risk.
My Position
I agree with the core concern raised: the United States must never be pushed into war based on outside pressure, flawed intelligence, or political influence that does not prioritize American lives.
War decisions must be made in the interest of the United States—not any foreign government. Our military exists to defend our country, not to fight wars that do not serve the American people.
America First Means:
- No war without clear, direct national interest
- No sending U.S. troops into preventable conflicts
- Independent intelligence verification before military action
- Accountability when leaders mislead the public
- Putting veterans and active-duty service members first
Fact Check: Presidential Powers & Foreign Influence
There have been longstanding debates about U.S. foreign policy decisions and alliances. It is important for voters to rely on verified facts and credible reporting when evaluating claims about influence, intelligence, and past decisions.
Regarding claims about pardons or espionage cases, the United States has historically handled such matters through formal legal and diplomatic processes. Voters should review credible historical records and official documentation when evaluating these issues.
As Commander in Chief
If elected President, I will:
- Ensure U.S. military action is based solely on American national interest
- Protect American troops from unnecessary foreign conflicts
- Demand transparency in intelligence used to justify war
- Prioritize veterans, not foreign policy agendas
- Hold leadership accountable for decisions that put lives at risk
The American people deserve leadership that puts the United States first—not politics, not foreign pressure, and not narratives that lead us into unnecessary war.
Learn more about my campaign:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
For Immediate Release
MOTTA 2028 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN
Transparency, Accountability, and Justice for All Americans
The Motta 2028 campaign announces an expanded platform focused on restoring trust in government, supporting veterans, and ensuring transparency on issues of national importance.
Campaign Promises
1. Strengthen National Defense
Ensure the United States military remains the most advanced and prepared force in the world.
2. Support Our Veterans
Expand healthcare, mental health services, disability support, and long-term recognition for all veterans.
3. Address Toxic Exposure for Veterans
Investigate and treat toxic exposure cases affecting service members, including veterans connected to classified assignments and test sites such as Area 51. Ensure affected veterans receive full medical care, benefits, and recognition.
4. Justice for Survivors
Pursue accountability in trafficking and abuse cases, including those linked to Jeffrey Epstein, and provide lasting support and protection for survivors.
5. Transparency on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)
Commit to responsible disclosure of government-held information regarding UAP, reviewing credible reporting and informing the American people while protecting legitimate national security concerns.
6. Independent Expert Review
Appoint independent experts, researchers, and medical professionals, including voices outside government, to review evidence and advise on disclosure, public health, and national security issues.
7. Government Accountability and Oversight
Strengthen oversight of federal agencies, including the FBI and CIA, to ensure lawful conduct, transparency, and accountability to the American people.
8. Declassify Key Historical Records
Continue efforts to fully release records related to major historical events, including the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, wherever lawful and appropriate.
9. Secure the Homeland
Enhance border security, cybersecurity, and counterterrorism efforts to protect the nation and its citizens.
10. Protect Constitutional Rights
Defend civil liberties, due process, freedom of speech, and equal justice under the law.
Closing Statement
The Motta 2028 campaign supports transparency and continued public review of unresolved global events, including the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, while honoring the 239 lives lost. We recognize the ongoing public interest in this case and the role that independent researchers and commentators have played in keeping attention on unanswered questions, including Ashton Forbes.
The campaign also supports independent journalism and the role it plays in a free society. Voices such as George Webb and other independent journalists have contributed to public debate by asking difficult questions, challenging official narratives, and encouraging public scrutiny. A healthy democracy depends on open inquiry, responsible reporting, and the pursuit of truth grounded in evidence.
About Motta 2028
The Motta 2028 campaign is committed to restoring trust through transparency, standing up for veterans, supporting survivors, and ensuring accountability across government institutions.
Media Contact
Campaign Communications Office
Motta 2028
Statement to Voters
National Security, Accountability, and Leadership
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I believe the American people deserve honest analysis, accountability in military decisions, and leadership that learns from past mistakes.
In a recent analysis, former U.S. Marine intelligence officer Scott Ritter outlined a serious situation involving U.S. naval operations and Iranian mine warfare strategy. His background includes service as a Marine Corps intelligence officer and weapons inspector, giving him direct experience in military analysis and strategic planning.
The analysis describes a major warning for American leadership: two U.S. destroyers entered a mined area in the Strait of Hormuz and struck multiple naval mines in seconds. The point is not only the damage itself, but what it reveals about military planning, readiness, and whether known threats were taken seriously before forces were placed in danger.
According to the transcript, the deeper issue was the lack of mine-clearing capability in the region at the moment it was needed most. The argument is that known risks were not met with the proper preparation, leaving American forces exposed in one of the most important maritime chokepoints in the world.
What This Means for Voters
I support the core principle behind Scott Ritter’s analysis: America needs accountability in military planning and decision-making. We cannot keep putting service members in preventable danger because of failures in strategy, logistics, or leadership.
This is about more than one incident. It is about whether the people making life-and-death decisions are actually preparing for the threats they know exist. It is about whether the United States is operating from strength, discipline, and realism.
My Policy Position
- American troops must never be sent into preventable danger.
- Critical military capabilities should never be removed without real, ready replacements.
- Defense decisions must be based on operational reality, not political convenience.
- Military readiness must include preparation for asymmetric and unconventional threats.
- Leadership must be held accountable when planning failures put lives and national interests at risk.
I support Scott Ritter’s broader warning because it aligns with my campaign’s commitment to serious leadership, strong defense, and honest accountability. America needs leaders who will tell the truth, plan ahead, and put the safety of service members and the national interest first.
Learn more about my campaign and policy platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com
Statement on Area 51 Veterans
As Commander in Chief, I Will Fight for the Veterans Our Government Tried to Ignore
As a candidate for President of the United States in 2028, I stand with the veterans who served at the Nevada Test and Training Range, including the site known worldwide as Area 51. These men and women answered their country’s call, carried out sensitive missions, and helped protect America during some of the most important years of our military history.
Now many of them say they are sick, many are battling cancer, and too many families believe their loved ones were exposed to toxic conditions while serving in silence. According to the transcript, these veterans say their service remains classified or data-masked, making it difficult to verify where they served and receive the care and benefits they earned.
What the Transcript Shows
The transcript describes veterans and contractors who say they were stationed at the Nevada Test and Training Range during the 1980s and early 1990s. Many report serious illnesses, including rare cancers, tumors, and long-term health problems. Some believe their families may also have suffered from exposure carried home on uniforms and equipment.
The transcript also says a proposed fix in the National Defense Authorization Act, known as Section 1066, would have helped identify those who served there and recognize the contaminated environment they were exposed to. That provision was removed from the final bill, leaving many veterans feeling ignored and abandoned.
These veterans are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for recognition, medical care, documentation, and basic fairness. They believe the government knew the area was contaminated and still sent people there without proper warning or lasting support.
My Position
I support these veterans. I support full transparency where national security allows it. I support action, not delay. And as Commander in Chief, I would make it a priority to ensure that no veteran is denied care because the government refuses to acknowledge where that veteran served.
A promise made to the men and women of the United States military must be a promise kept. If our government sent personnel into dangerous environments in the name of national defense, then our government has a duty to take care of them when the mission is over.
What I Will Fight For as President
- Immediate review of toxic exposure cases connected to Area 51 and the Nevada Test and Training Range.
- Recognition of affected veterans whose service records were masked or classified.
- Faster access to VA care, compensation, and service connection for documented illnesses.
- Protection for widows and families seeking survivor benefits.
- Executive action where necessary to cut through bureaucratic delay.
- Real accountability for officials who knew of contamination and failed to act.
Message to Voters
This issue goes beyond one group of veterans. It is about whether America keeps faith with the people who served in secret, sacrificed in silence, and were later told they did not exist. That is unacceptable.
I believe the office of the President must defend the forgotten, not just the visible. If I am elected President in 2028, I will treat this as a matter of duty, justice, and national honor.
These veterans served this country. They should not have to beg their country to recognize them.
Learn more about my campaign and platform:
https://www.votemotta2028.com
https://www.votemotta2028.com